"various changes"
this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
108 points (87.0% liked)
Programmer Humor
32822 readers
230 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Initial commit
I have on multiple occasions done a much more verbose variant of that: "I genuinely cannot remember what I changed"
Fix tpyo
"Improve performance by removing a function that never did anything" the story of my life
"Eigentlich fertig" was for an IP subnet calculator that I programmed with a fellow student
Und uneigentlich? :D
"If you are reading this, you are in the wrong branch."
“i cant believe this works i think”
"idk what happened but it works fine now"
"fixed"
"Forgot to commit changes lol"
I also apparently forgot append was a thing
"Updated README"
I'm ashamed... It's simply "bump deps"
Did I also touch some code and tests connected to dependency updates. Yes.
Did I document any of that? No.
Did I spend more time writing this comment the thinking about the commit. Most definitely.
Will I be bisecting to this commit after our next deploy and cursing at myself? Probably.
this is terrible, will rewrite later
"Added missing lifecycle blocks"
" "
- fixes #22
"push files"
(It's a personal repo for homework assignments)
see #234
wip
How am I supposed to do that I'm waiting for docker to rebuild my image to know if my new configuration fucks everything
"relearning c++ arrays again"
"Move from GitHub to Forgejo"
"fixed. whoops..."
merge staging
Changes
"can still be better but priority changed"
"TLDR..."
I'm kidding, my applications are so simple version control would be synonymous with entire rewrites as I lean new things.
"formatting and typo"
"fix previous commit"
Notes
...
"Did stuff"
e12fa3b (HEAD -> main, origin/main) No
“Expanded unit test to cover new functionality” true story
PAPYRUSSSSSS!!!!
Refactor package structure
Fixes issues in PR
scoping
It was for work so I can't check right now (Gitlab which is only accessible on LAN), but it was something like "updated README.MD"
"src/utils/typing: added tests for isArray"
we have 90% coverage minimum
"feat: replace every function in FunctionIdentifier with a single closure
My goal with less-function-id was to create a more neat solution but instead it turned into something far more ugly and limiting" You sometimes think a solutioniis good and neat until you implement it
"Added brew to list of accepted package managers"
From my "install all the things" script I host on github
(translated from German) I can't write
chore: update image tag
"Default rating"
.