this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
734 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59622 readers
2786 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 515 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (37 children)

Judkins said that after the finger test, a lead cybertruck engineer at Tesla said he did the video wrong.

The engineer told him the frunk increases in pressure every single time it closes and detects resistance, Judkins said. It's going to assume you want to close the frunk and maybe something like a bag is getting in the way, which would make it close harder.

Are you kidding me? You did the test wrong on a safety critical feature? No you dumbass engineer, you designed it wrong. Why in the holy fuck would you make a safety critical algorithm keep applying more pressure on subsequent attempts??? That's literally the opposite of what you do for safety.

[–] [email protected] 138 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The engineer told him the frunk increases in pressure every single time it closes and detects resistance, Judkins said. It’s going to assume you want to close the frunk and maybe something like a bag is getting in the way, which would make it close harder.

What the fuck kind of idiots are leading things over there? "Something's in the way. Better crush it!" What a bunch of morons putting everyone in danger.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"If it encounters resistance, the brushless motor increases in pressure until it closes fully." Guess the company:

  1. DeWalt
  2. Milwaukee
  3. Makita
  4. Tesla
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 99 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Why the hell would it close harder if there is something in the way? That's not the correct behavior for a lid, that's the correct behavior for powered shears.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 87 points 6 months ago (4 children)

We built it wrong as a joke

[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Cybertruck owners can have a finger guillotine. as a treat

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 6 months ago

I wonder if the guy that designed autopilot had the same idea. "So when the car detects resistance up ahead in the form of a crowd or wall, it will accelerate to make sure it goes through!"

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] [email protected] 210 points 6 months ago (9 children)

Feel like this could have been demonstrated with a hot dog

[–] [email protected] 100 points 6 months ago (14 children)

Or a chicken drumstick for somewhat similar bone strength.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Is this the dipstick that tried it with a carrot, it cut the tip off and then said he was going to try it with his finger to be sure?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He did demonstrate it that way, specifically with a carrot. And it somewhat worked. The problem is they programmed it to do more and more pressure every time it fails meaning that doing the carrot first actually caused a safety issue. He only moved onto his finger because the safety feature seemed to be working.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The engineer told him the frunk increases in pressure every single time it closes and detects resistance, Judkins said. It's going to assume you want to close the frunk and maybe something like a bag is getting in the way, which would make it close harder.

Geniuses.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 127 points 6 months ago (6 children)

There's plenty of dumb to go around, but the word frunk by itself is the dumbest thing about this story.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I figured that was a fucking typo at first

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Let me guess: Front trunk? Please tell me I'm wrong.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 116 points 6 months ago (15 children)

Man youtubers are dumb as hell. Use a stick or something

[–] [email protected] 80 points 6 months ago (13 children)

He used a banana, an organic dildo, and a carrot. It snapped the carrot and then he decided to try with his arm, hand, and finger.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago

I think hot dogs are good test subjects

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 111 points 6 months ago (5 children)

A Tesla engineer said the test was done wrong because the frunk increases in pressure every time.

"You are holding it wrong!" 🤣

[–] [email protected] 71 points 6 months ago (12 children)

Of course it just keeps hitting harder when things are in the way.

Literally Tesla's response

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He did the test wrong because he's experimenting with "safety" algorithms that the manufacturer has provided little-to-no documentation on and is having to come up with answers on his own. Maybe he wouldn't be "doing it wrong" if Tesla hadn't over-engineered every aspect of their piece of shit truck in the first place. This thing is a solution in search of a problem, and it'll chop your fingers off until it finds it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago (3 children)

If it increases in pressure every time, I’m now curious how many times you need to close the trunk to cut a finger off

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

He forgot to turn on Finger Safe Mode™️ before closing the trunk

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Judkins said that after the finger test, a lead cybertruck engineer at Tesla said he did the video wrong.

lmao

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (11 children)

Well apparently it's programmed to bypass the safety system after 3 attempts under the assumption that the user knows best.

This seems like a really dumb choice, but I can see why an engineer would want to point out that it's not incompetent engineering but an incompetent business department.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Judkins said that after the finger test, a lead cybertruck engineer at Tesla said he did the video wrong.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 6 months ago

You know what they say.. Don't stick your finger in crazy

[–] [email protected] 57 points 6 months ago

Bought it to begin with so his intelligence is suspect at the outset

[–] [email protected] 57 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Title: Idiot Cybertruck Owner.

That's all you need for the title.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What person with an automated cargo door closure mechanism has thought "stop protecting my stuff and just fucking close"?

I'll admit it annoys me when there's something in the way that keeps my door from latching and it reopens, but I'd rather have to clear the door and shut it manually than it force itself closed and jams the door or break my shit.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Its just like elevators, really. You put your hand in to stop the doors closing, they open again before touching your arm. Next time they close gently on your arm. Third time, the doors snap shut and the elevator ascends without further warning, resulting in traumatic amputation.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Someone should tell this guy that hot dogs exist.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The cybertruck is the dumbest tech product and that's after you compare it to the Vision Pro and AI pin

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago

Do we also have something like r/dontputyourdickinthat on lemmy?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I saw my first cybertruck in person the other day. It looks incredibly dumb in promotional photos, but it's astonishing how much stupider it looks in traffic surrounded by normal vehicles.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

This is live example of how IQ doesn’t correlate with „success” though who knows if this funny test would even correlate with what we mean when we think of intelligence in this example

Maybe the greed for views and fanboism wins over no matter the brains

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 35 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The YouTuber started the video by closing the frunk on produce like a carrot, cucumber, and banana before the update was installed. The frunk chopped all of the produce when it was placed in the frunk.

...

The YouTuber then tried the same test with the update installed and was impressed with the improvement.

"With just a software update, the Tesla Cybertruck frunk is way safer," he said. "We witnessed it destroy a ton of vegetables, and then post-update did nothing."

He didn't do a finger until building confidence first. He also tried an arm and then his hand before finally trying his finger.

So not as crazy as the article made it out to be, and his finger wasn't seriously hurt either, but it hurt enough that he didn't want to try it again after getting info from the engineer about it getting stronger after each failed attempt.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The crazy part to me is that he tried a carrot and it didn't open for it. Yet he thought it was a good idea to try his finger which it about the same size.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›