this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
988 points (98.1% liked)

Political Memes

5199 readers
2904 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 77 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This assumes workers own the means of production.

Under capitalism, boss tells all the workers to get fucked.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That which ought to be is not influenced by what is. It's true that worker control over the means of production is preferable to capitalism, but neither scenario here actually requires it. In fact, if the economy is fully automated, it would imply that the means of production couldn't be owned by the workers, since there wouldn't be any. That's how you get post-scarcity space communism. Socialism would ensure the longevity and existence of an arrangement that results in automation leading to better lives for everyone rather than human extinction. However, I'm beginning to suspect that with the time frame we're working with, aiming for socialism to the detriment of achieving any such arrangement might be a serious misplay on our part. Of course, that opens the possibility for humanity to be subjugated by an oppressive regime of immortal cyborg oligarchs. Even so, this horrifying possibility still preserves the opportunity for rebellion and revolution to set things aright whereas extinction would be ultimate defeat.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

You just accidentally described both The Dune Universe, and The Warhammer 40K Universe.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yay, a robot took over my job! Now I am free to closely monitor it until I stop caring about the mistakes!

Edit: And get fired!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago

Closely monitor it for less pay!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago (7 children)

If I have no job, I have no money.

Who's going to buy the stuff these robots are building?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

The search for short term profits doesn't give a fuck

That's next quarter's problem

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

Other rich people. Robots will just stop making $10k cars and start making yachts. Rich people will just keep the game going between themselves.

[–] Jyek 4 points 4 months ago

If people don't have money, people can't buy the goods being produced, demand will plummet and supply will skyrocket leading to the logical conclusion that a UBI is necessary to supplement life in an automated world. If that doesn't happen, I Guess revolution?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Automate your job but don't tell your boss.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Automate, but maje sure you take ownership of the production and get paid accordingly. Your tip is usually the best way to accomplish it.

unless you can spin it into a business to business service that you can sell after leaving the company to many more and paid more than your job's salary.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Woah, that's dangerous thinking! Why don't we bring back house-servants instead to give all of these filthy poors Gainful Employment(tm)?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Or…we could say “fuck the poors, my house servant will be a robot”.

To be fair though I think that the really rich will find another way to use us for their amusement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Well, they have robots for the actual tasks, the human employees are just there so they have someone to lord over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (6 children)

If corporations cared more about people and less about money this may just work.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Until there is no longer a massive bill to start a company this is a pipe dream. Who's name is the mortgage under is all you have to ask before the model breaks down...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (5 children)

We should tax every company the equivalent of all the workers' salaries (adjusted for modern cost of living) they automate out of a job and use the money to fund a UBI.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Don't give me that do-goody-good bullshit!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Many inventions created to "free people" ended up landing them with expectations to work even harder with their newfound "free time"—and they ended up being pigeon-holed into more limited jobs. This is especially true for women as appliances were created to help free them from domestic duties, but they have been landed into still doing those and working full-time or more.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Gotta look into robot maintenance now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you look throughout history, the amount of things done because they had to be is infinitessimal compared to things done for desire

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

yes, and no, desire drives a king to attack it's neighbour, but is it also desire that enlists the soldier? Maybe the soldier has desire for things het could not morally do at home, maybe they had to go to war to got war because he had bills to pay, is it more moral to kill if you think you have no choice? Is it moral to kill if the outcome of not kill would result i that guy still dying but also yourself, 2 ded?

like bro, i agree 100 with your sentiment. But i think that actually people are animals, they will always, on average, do wathever the fuck they feel like doing, good people exist but majority be majoritying. And people who look to please not god(society, thy neighbour, your fellow human, etc) but only seek to please oneselve will always have an advantage in any system.

so basicaly, exactly what you already said. But i hate that it is no fucling nihilstic, so everyone is just shit then? And if i find my supposed counter-jewel in the rough, then run of together and forget about my brother, society, my human kin, then i am literally just as bad.

like i like to believe everyone should have the duty to do all that he can do for anyone. But southpark, society, reality showed me, i could also just get shot and that would be the end of it. Even worse, my death could cascade and cause my child to follow the same path, and he could also just get shot, go crazy, lose all joy in life, and for what? For a fucking cause that is so fucking simple that one would almost get the feeling there is some global bamboozle going on. "No one should go hungry, no one should go cold, if you see someone who cannot fullfil this duty to the world, do your duty to the world "

i left out no shooting each other, no stealing, no rape etcetcetc because i think it could be obvious with a little bit of do treat em like you should yourself. But hey, im just a schizo these days, because my capitalist gains go op i hate myself 24/7 for not immediately fixing all the problems, when a nice girl ask me how i am doing i tell em about how our goverment be shooting child as we speak, about how i will never be able to have children because it will be impossible to sustain them emotionally with my 60 hour job, how fucked up it is public transit drivers gotta protest a whole year for a fucking pee brake and some fucking respect.

so yeah, fighting nhilism every day. Wish i could love myself a little and by result become an animal. Animals do get more sex tho, so who knows

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (14 children)

To be the devils advocate here, how would that system be fair to workers not replaced by robots? Like if im a plumber i still gotta put in my 40+ hrs/week but a factory worker just gets UBI now?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The thing about a UBI is that it's universal. You'd get a UBI despite still working as a plumber. For you, it would be extra cash - for the factory worker laid off, it would be a lifeline.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (23 children)

Everyone would get UBI. Nobody would be forcing you to keep your plumbing job. And even if you stuck around, you wouldn't have to work 40+ hours plumbing weeks because UBI would give you the ability to chose what dmjobs youd want to take on. And maybe now that those factory workers aren't stuck in factories, some of them might actually want to learn how to be plumbers, meaning more plumbers to take on jobs.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Or you put in 16 hours a week, and some other people do the rest of the hours.

On the other hand, we could also train the factory workers to become assistant consultants, or give them some other bullshit job...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Please, no more bullshit jobs, we have enough of those to untangle

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

40+ hrs/week

Isn't that the thing? We automatize so much and instead of getting the 20hrs/week, we struggel so much to improve efficiency. But for what? There are sectors I agree with that approach (like medicine, climate impact and so on). But if I have to use the same smartphone technology for 10 years or don't upgrade to an 8k TV in the next 20 years, that is utterly fine by me, if that means that I'll have to wrk 20hours less per week.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›