Futurology

2150 readers

39 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

107

‘Cheap and simple’ Bill Gates-backed fusion concept surpasses heat of the Sun in milestone moment (www.rechargenews.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 53 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's a silly title.

The sun doesn't produce a lot of energy because it is hot. The sun produces energy because it is big. All functional experimental fusion reactors operate at much higher temperatures than the sun.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Like 10x for takamak iirc

[+] [email protected] -6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's a straight up factually incorrect title. Heat is a measure of energy. The sun produces 3.9e26 joules of heat per second. So no, they did not surpass the heat of the sun.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Nah, that's a nitpick. In common English heat is just presence of high temperatures, and there's no specific word for thermal energy.

Also, that would be heat/time, so power basically. The sum of all heat currently in the sun would be larger, considering how slow the convection is among other things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We're talking about energy generation, so the distinction is pretty important. I think a layperson can understand that it takes far more heat to boil a pot of water than a match can produce, even if the match is at a higher temperature than the stove top.

A layperson would describe the heat of a campfire as being much higher than the heat of a candle, even if theyre the same temperature.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I guess that's fair. They're definitely talking about temperature, and I think most would understand it that way, because the layman might not even know the connection between higher temperatures and better heat engines, but economically speaking it's not super relevant. The actual power output is probably negligible; it's a research machine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Heat in terms of temperature is a measure of molecular kinetic energy, so you can say two things are the same temperature regardless of the total energy of the system, which is a function of the change in temperature, mass and specific heat of a substance.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Its actually pretty "easy" to get hotter than the sun

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

An electrical arc is as hot as the surface of the sun.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Even if you get as hot as the core, you're not doing the same amount of fission unless you have similar pressure at the same time, and no you don't. It's a bit complicated by the fact the sun is mostly protium, and has low volumetric energy output as a result, but that's the gist.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Did it produce surplus energy?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Shhh, we're talking about heat generation

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How many billionaires can be put inside at the same time? Asking for no reason.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

“…$30,000 a gram in 2022, almost as precious as a diamond.” 🤨

[–] threelonmusketeers 4 points 10 months ago

I though that was strange too. I'm sure you can get a gram of industrial diamond dust for much cheaper.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

BP and Shell: 👀

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Article says Shell invested $160m in Zap in 2022.

[–] emergencyfood 2 points 10 months ago

The smart ones are investing in renewables.