this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
415 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5762 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 86 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Funny how fast divisive far right sites are dropping now that the Russian money pipeline is shut down due to sanctions.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 6 months ago

Russia has cut back to only funding republican congressmen. Austerity is a bitch.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The sanctions from 2 years ago?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's a bit of a lag time while money already moved is exhausted. Note how many Republican (and other divisive far left/right) orgs are suddenly running out of money now that they don't have a constant infusion

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are plenty of billionaires in the US funding this. They are declaring bankruptcy because of losing their case against Georgia election interference. Blaming every instance of American fascism on Russia just removes the blame from the actual perpetrators.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

¿Por qué no los dos responsables (perpetrators)?

[–] [email protected] 46 points 6 months ago

Happy for them, I wish them many more bankruptcies in the future

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Apparently they said they weren't broke, that it was fake news and everyone saying they declared bankruptcy was a filthy liberal.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago

LoL, not broke, just don't want to appear to be too wealthy when those defamation lawsuits start calling.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

Good. Gateway Pundit is a name I recognize well from all the shenanigans that happened a few years ago. May they rot.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

Damn fox news went bankrupt?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

Idiots who go broke failing to scam other idiots are the biggest idiots of all.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Everybody in this thread is talking like this is a good thing, but it's really just a scam to try to weasel out of paying for their defamation.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Gateway Pundit, a rightwing website known for spreading election conspiracies, will declare bankruptcy as it faces lawsuits for defamation.

The site’s parent company, TGP Communications, will file for bankruptcy in Florida “as a result of the progressive liberal lawfare attacks against our media outlet”, founder Jim Hoft wrote on the website.

In a separate case, Freeman and Moss secured a $148m judgment against Rudy Giuliani for spreading election lies about them and defaming them.

Gateway Pundit also faces a suit in Colorado from a former Dominion Voting Systems employee, Eric Coomer, who alleges the outlet defamed him by claiming he rigged the election against Trump.

Election offices have faced waves of harassing messages after Gateway Pundit stories have published, often targeting staff members with threatening and abusive language.

Hoft said that the company seeking bankruptcy protection was “not an admission of fault or culpability”, but instead a way to reorganize and consolidate lawsuits “when attacks are coming from all sides”.


The original article contains 291 words, the summary contains 161 words. Saved 45%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Russia having to spend money on their war?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

They forgot to sell "anti-woke" toxins to put in and on your body along with merchandise to advertise what a moronic and shitty person you are.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Womps and Preyers🙏

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Go woke go broke?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Of course! All of this was astroturfed by wealthy benefactors who only kept dumping money for the purpose of getting policy out of it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Awwww… anyway.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

OH NO So what's a good way to cook edamame for people who aren't used to eating it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I steam mine with shank of oligarch. *Chefs kiss