Read their privacy policy, I guess.
this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
58 points (76.9% liked)
Privacy
32442 readers
759 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Usually those documents leave many legal back doors open, just in case. It doesn’t automatically mean that they are currently backstabbing you, but they want to have that option available to them. If you see lots of open doors like that, they are there for a reason. An honest company doesn’t need any, whereas a shady company wants all of them.
I thought it was a title to an article but it turn out it was someone who mistook Lemmy for a search engine
What if it IS a search engine? Maybe there's a site out there that posts every question to a random fediverse sub!
Matter of fact, let's make one. We'll just use scripts to post every question to social media but program it to say the wrong thing first so that it gets instant results when everyone jumps on the "person" who was wrong. Brilliant!
Not that long ago, they drastically improved their privacy policy, consent and opt-out capabilities. Is it perfect? No but it has never been better.
If you consider the way you choose to allocate your time and and a portion of your entertainment budget private… then yes.
Curious to learn if it's limited to data within Steam itself or more. So far the only thing that I saw that could change my behavior is the start screen on Steam (even if I start games, e.g BG3) straight from my KDE menu. Curious to know if that can be disabled.
it's named .desktop, steam put them on your .local/share/application
Thanks for the clarification but seems I wasn't clear. I know how to start a game without Steam and how .desktop work (made some before). What I meant is rather can I start Steam itself to avoid their welcome screen and go straight to my game library? This way I would avoid their "suggestions" which are, in fine, ads (and thus what I imagine they collect private data for).
Yes.
You can disable the ad popup window and you can set your start page to library. It's all in the settings somewhere.
There are many tools for Linux that do a lot of different stuff
I remember there were some that allowed running games straight without steam and maybe even creating shortcuts, but any of those is a headache to setup, I mean, to run a game without steam you need to do 15 manual steps, to create a shortcut 30 manual steps
Edit: maybe something has changed, I don't use steam a lot, and I used those tools some years ago
P.s. the coolest tool for me is the app for extracting tye session with all those steam guard and etc
you con select to disable that welcome screen and automatically open library just need to change steam settings
Answering my own question here, since nobody actually helped :
- Steam Settings
- Interface
- Start Up Location
- change "Store" to "Library"
They can potentially collect a lot of stuff but I dont really see a reason why they would sell / use it for anything besides analytics/marketing internally
To be fair what really pissed me about Steam was the push into CS:2 without no regard for anyone (macOS?) or any machine that can't run it... and a few other similar situations like the SimCity 4 version that is buggy and unreliable unlike the gog one that actually has all the required patches for modern hardware.
Can't you still get the old counter strike by using the beta channels?
And I mean... Ultimately blame Apple for being a pain in the butt and not supporting vulkan.
Nah they should've made csgo2 a different game in the store and keep csgo1 the same like they did for cs source and all the other older versions
It's a rock and a hard place. Upset people who have put money into skins that now don't transfer or upset people with old / non compatible hardware.
CS2 is the only reason I keep a windows install, Idk how they fucked their own native client so bad but my 3080 moves like a slides how while reporting 250+ fps compared to buttery 340+ on windows :'(
I play cs2 on arch linux and it works perfectly fine.
Just install Linux on the Mac and it should support Vulkan just fine (unless it's on an M chip)
shocked face