TCB13

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

So, looks like tons of HTTP services and SSH.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Great, but what services are you hosting ? What ports you need?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah, those may work. Since you’ve one how does it look like? Are there blocked ports line SMTP? Are the IP good / aren’t blacklisted everywhere already? Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, it may be less customizable but at least is fast and error free (unlike NextCloud)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah, Incus FTW!!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Yeah because making it isn't only about just waiting for time to pass and money to come it, it is also about compounding.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

The thing with Ubuntu / Canonical isn't that it doesn't work, it is that they've bad policies and by using their stuff you're making yourself vulnerable to something akin to what happened with VMWare ESXi or with CentOS licensing - they may change their mind at some point and you'll be left with a pile of machines and little to no time to move to other solution.

For starters Ubuntu is the only serious and corporate-backed distribution to ever release a major version on the website and have the ISO installer broken for a few days.

Ubuntu’s kernel is also a dumpster fire of hacks waiting for someone upstream to implement things properly so they can backport them and ditch their own implementations. We've seen this multiple times, shiftfs vs VFS idmap shifting is a great example of the issue.

Canonical has contributing to open-source for a long time, but have you heard about what happened with LXD/LXC? LXC was made with significant investments, primarily from IBM and Canonical. LXD was later developed as an independent project under the Linux Containers umbrella, also funded by Canonical. Everything seemed to be progressing well until last year when Canonical announced that LXD would no longer remain an independent project. They removed it from the Linux Containers project and brought it under in-house development.

They effectively took control of the codebase, changed repositories, relicensed previous contributions under a more restrictive license. To complicate matters, they required all contributors to sign a contract with new limitations and impositions. This shift has caused concerns, but most importantly LXD became essentially a closed-off in-house project of Canonical.

Some people may be annoyed at Snaps as well but I won't get into that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Look so damn good, they even seem to know what padding is this time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Will they learn how to apply padding to stuff this time?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This means I don’t need to mess around with QBT’s “proxy” settings?

No, you don't. In short, trackers will look at the source address of the incoming connection on their side, that means you VPS IP because you're doing NAT on the VPS.

Just make sure qBittorrent is restricted to the WG interface and nothing else.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago

I agree with that, 100% but for the majority of the world how green it is usually depends on how far-left you are.

5
Enter MacBB :) (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

MacBB is a community of apple users that has been around for a while. You can find and provide help, apps and engage in random talk mostly about the Apple ecosystem.

Registration is open and free for everyone. No ads, no BS.

--->> https://macbb.org/

Enjoy!

3
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

As a middle ground, we could implement a solution for the bottom tier: small to medium sites and blogs. These sites don’t necessarily need a full-fledged MySQL database.

SQLite seems to be the perfect fit:

  • It is the most widely used database worldwide
  • It is cross-platform and can run on any device
  • It is included by default on all PHP installations (unless explicitly disabled)
  • WordPress’s minimum requirements would be a simple PHP server, without the need for a separate database server.
  • SQLite support enables lower hosting costs, decreases energy consumption, and lowers performance costs on lower-end servers.

What would the benefits of SQLite be?

Officially supporting SQLite in WordPress could have many benefits. Some notable ones would include:

  • Increased performance on lower-end servers and environments.
  • Potential for WordPress growth in markets where we did not have access due to the system’s requirements.
  • Potential for growth in the hosting market using installation “scenarios”.
  • Reduced energy consumption – increased sustainability for the WordPress project.
  • Further WordPress’s mission to “democratize publishing” for everyone.
  • Easier to contribute to WordPress – download the files and run the built-in PHP server without any other setup required.
  • Easier to use automated tests suite.
  • Sites can be “portable” and self-contained.

Source and other links:

-97
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

New GNOME dialog on the right:

Apple's dialog:

They say GNOME isn't a copy of macOS but with time it has been getting really close. I don't think this is a bad thing however they should just admit it and then put some real effort into cloning macOS instead of the crap they're making right now.

Here's the thing: Apple's design you'll find that they carefully included an extra margin between the "Don't Save" and "Cancel" buttons. This avoid accidental clicks on the wrong button so that people don't lose their work when they just want to click "Cancel".

So much for the GNOME, vision and their expert usability team :P

 

Hi,

Is there anyone using Amcrest IP4M-1041B with Home Assistant? I've a few questions about software and integration.

  1. From what I hear, this camera can be setup 100% offline, connected via cable to any computer and by using a built in WebUI the camera has, is this true?

  2. It offers pan, tilt or zoom. Does it work really good with HA? Can it be operated without any Amcrest software / internet connection?

  3. The features above allow you to set preset locations, can that be done on HA / WebUI / without the Amcrest app as well?

  4. Does it really operate all features offline and is it reliable? Eg. motion detection works as expected / doesn't miss events?

  5. What's your overall experience with the camera? Does it compare to let's say a TP-Link tapo?

Thank you.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/14398634

Unfortunately I was proven to be right about Riley Testut. He's yet another greedy person barely batter than Apple. After bitching to Apple to remove GBA4iOS from the App Store he's now leveraging Delta to force people into his AltStore.

Delta has finally made its way to the App Store. Additionally, the Delta developer has also published their alternative marketplace, AltStore, in the EU today.

If you're in the EU you'll only be able to get Delta on the AltStore and that requires:

This is complete bullshit he could've just launched Delta on the App Store in Europe as well but he decided not to.

Thanks Riley Testut for being a dick to the people that actually forced Apple into allowing alternative app stores in the first place.


Github issue related to this dick move: https://github.com/rileytestut/Delta/issues/292

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/14398634

Unfortunately I was proven to be right about Riley Testut. He's yet another greedy person barely batter than Apple. After bitching to Apple to remove GBA4iOS from the App Store he's now leveraging Delta to force people into his AltStore.

Delta has finally made its way to the App Store. Additionally, the Delta developer has also published their alternative marketplace, AltStore, in the EU today.

If you're in the EU you'll only be able to get Delta on the AltStore and that requires:

This is complete bullshit he could've just launched Delta on the App Store in Europe as well but he decided not to.

Thanks Riley Testut for being a dick to the people that actually forced Apple into allowing alternative app stores in the first place.


Github issue related to this dick move: https://github.com/rileytestut/Delta/issues/292

 

Unfortunately I was proven to be right about Riley Testut. He's yet another greedy person barely batter than Apple. After removed to Apple to remove GBA4iOS from the App Store he's now leveraging Delta to force people into his AltStore.

Delta has finally made its way to the App Store. Additionally, the Delta developer has also published their alternative marketplace, AltStore, in the EU today.

If you're in the EU you'll only be able to get Delta on the AltStore and that requires:

This is complete bullshit he could've just launched Delta on the App Store in Europe as well but he decided not to.

Thanks Riley Testut for being a dick to the people that actually forced Apple into allowing alternative app stores in the first place.


Github issue related to this dick move: https://github.com/rileytestut/Delta/issues/292

 

Boas,

Como muitos aqui sou cliente da Vodafone (móvel apenas) há muitos anos e gostava de deixar os meus comentários sobre o que tenho visto a acontecer com a operadora na última década. Este post vai ser escrito assim meio em modo "rant" e começou porque a Vodafone ainda não tem um serviço Wifi Calling.

Estamos em 2024 e a Vodafone continua a não disponibilizar um serviço bastante útil que está disponível nas outras operadoras nacionais. Este serviço não é apenas um capricho, é importante para todos os clientes que vivem em zonas com fraca cobertura até muitas vezes para situações de emergência (como eu muitas vezes).

Relembro que esta tecnologia está disponível no iPhone desde 2013 tendo sido adotada em massa na maior parte dos países a partir de 2015.

Há coisas que eu não consigo compreender no serviço da Vodafone, ou melhor, na gestão e nas prioridades da empresa, em resumo:

  • Serviço Wi-Fi Calling que continua a não existir em 2024: como já disse, um serviço essencial a quem tem fraca cobertura da rede móvel e com a vantagens clara para a Vodafone de reduzir a quantidade de chamadas a serem transportadas pela rede móvel. Claro que a primeira operadora a ter isto foi a NOS porque com a fraca rede que tinham quanto menos chamadas pela infraestrutura móvel melhor;
  • Cobrança do serviço Vodafone OneNumber (eSIM para smartwatches): para além de terem demorado anos, mais do que a NOS ainda cobram 5€/mês pelo serviço. Este serviço deve ser gratuito uma vez que é mais uma forma de incentivar os clientes de smartwatches a consumir minutos/dados;
  • "Qualidade" de áudio das chamadas: uma chamada entre dois números da Vodafone tem menor qualidade de audio do que uma chamada entre qualquer outros dois números de outra operadora nacional. Até uma chamada de WhatsApp ou Facetime é hoje bastante superior a uma chamada pela rede Vodafone, noto que estamos a falar de uma chamada VoIP com compressão, transmitida pela Internet e mesmo que seja realizada em 4G e tenha de atravessar toda a infraestrutura da Vodafone até chegar a algum datacenter e retornar para outro cliente continua a ser superior;
  • Serviço cartão Duo Multi-SIM: permite utilizar de forma alternada dois equipamentos e apenas isso. O serviço da MEO permite utilizar em simultâneo dois equipamentos e podemos definir com o envio de um SMS qual dos equipamentos receberá chamadas. Realizar chamadas ou utilizar a internet fica disponível em simultâneo em ambos. Um serviço como o da MEO era mais uma boa forma da Vodafone incentivar o consumo, mas claro que são incapazes de reconhecer isto;
  • Chamadas e mensagens no computador: a Vodafone já teve um serviço destes mas acabou por abandoná-lo, mais uma grande falha na estratégia da empresa. Durante a pandemia assistimos às PMEs a adquirirem em massa soluções como o Zoom e o MS Teams, já pensaram na quantidade de negócio que a Vodafone perdeu por não disponibilizar uma simples aplicação de chamadas e video-chamadas no computador associada aos números de telefone dos clientes? Acredito que com uma campanha de marketing muito simples, no início da pandemia, pelo menos metade dessas PMEs teriam passado a usar uma solução da Vodafone apenas por conveniência e teriam tido a oportunidade de faturar milhares de horas de chamadas;
  • Falta de IPv6 no serviço de internet fixa: sem mais comentários;
  • Falta de um serviço "bridge": todas as outras operadoras disponibilizam, enquanto isso a Vodafone continua a forçar os seus clientes a utilizar os seus routers extremamente fracos e pouco flexíveis. Podiam só fazer como a MEO/NOS e adicionar uma opção para ligar o bridge numa das portas do router e deixarem os clientes utilizarem os equipamentos que quiserem.

Na última década a Vodafone passou de uma operadora pioneira em Portugal com serviços de qualidade quase ao operador mais rudimentar que temos tudo por má gestão de prioridades. Parece ser também o mais vulnerável a ataques informáticos, afinal a Vodafone foi quem já ficou praticamente um dia sem serviços e muito possivelmente ninguém na empresa consegue garantir que os dados dos clientes não foram comprometidos.

A minha sugestão para a gestão da Vodafone é simples: uma vez que são incapazes de desenvolver internamente soluções inovadoras limitem-se a observar as tendências do mercado e a copiar. Parece-me que a Vodafone para ter um rumo / novos produtos depende muito de "consultisses" e estudos de mercado questionáveis, isto é com base em perguntas e premissas pouco fundamentadas na realidade, em vez de observarem os clientes reais.

Qual é a vossa opinião sobre o estado atual e percurso da Vodafone?

 

Here's my take:

The domain aftermarket has a big problem... it exists. This market shouldn't ever be allowed to exist in the first place. ICANN should've blocked this bullshit a long time ago and forced registrars to just let domains expire and free the space. Also add a few provisions about unused domain names and about selling them.

21
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Hello,

So I have a Motorola SM56 USB Data Fax Modem (aka Apple USB Modem for some people) and according to information online this modem supports V.92, Caller ID, wake-on-ring and most importantly telephone answering (V.253).

At a place I happen to have an old telephone analog line that gets calls and unfortunately I can't get rid of. Any ideias / links / software on how can I use the modem + a low end box / ARM SBC to "digitize" the phone line into a generic SIP / VOIP that I can then connect to using MicroSIP on another computer?

Thank you.


Update on this:

I just tried the modem under Windows with a few programs such as Phone Dialer Pro and the built in dialer.exe and while the modem can detect incoming phone calls and place calls I can't pass the audio back to the operating system / phone software.

I did some research about the SM65 and it seems like it was designed to have an headset directly attached to it like on those PCI cards that also use it:

The built in COM port of the modems seems to be only usable to control the modem via AT commands and can't be used to pass audio form and to the system.

view more: next ›