217
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

What is it with Nike and sexualized athletic uniforms these days (see MBA see-through pants)? Did PornHub invest without anyone noticing?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ChokingHazard63 125 points 3 months ago

Maybe my ad blocker is working double time but how is there not a picture of the proposed outfit in the article?!?

Here you go

[-] [email protected] 95 points 3 months ago

fuck is that supposed to cover? half a coochie lol. one misstep and the cats out of the bag lol

[-] Habahnow 54 points 3 months ago

The deviant in me likes it, but man I don't think women should have to wear stuff like this to work if they don't want to.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don't know how to be completely proper without diminishing the meaning of my statement all the time, but I agree with this statement's substance and structure. I hope people can take comments like this without feeling degraded.

Nobody should be forced to wear a uniform that diminishes their hard work and achievements that earned them the required uniform. Olympians are going to want high performance garb - generally tight-fitting and light weight. That doesn't mean the team organizers should go hog wild on showing skin to boost ratings. It's impressive, inspiring, and (for me) a bit depressing to see the peak human form without being creepy, but these folks have worked far too hard to be objectified.

But if they're down, I'm down

*Edited afterthought: Do NCAA gymnasts have uniform issues? I don't see their competitions often, but they tend to stay in place to my knowledge. I'm not trying to argue for the new uniforms - it just seems like those uniforms would be a relevant case study.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Do NCAA gymnasts have uniform issues?

Meet ‘butt glue’ - the men can pick to wear shorts or leggings, but nah. Butt glue it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Patches 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

TIL at today years old what Cat is out of the bag means....

[-] clay_pidgin 23 points 3 months ago

It means to say something that can't be unsaid, usually in the context of blabbing a secret. The origin is from the British Royal Navy in the age of sail. The "cat" is a Cat'o' nine-tails a type of whip used for punishment. It was stored in a velvet bag, and once it came out there was no going back, it was going to be used on you.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

mate what do h think it means? not sure were on the same page here

[-] [email protected] 56 points 3 months ago

So the tops are nearly identical. But women clearly need massive lower ventilation...or something.

Yeah this just shows Nike is being sexist as fuck. Swap these suits by gender and let's see what happens.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago

Balls will roll

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Fair is fair

[-] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago

Wow, on top of that wild crotch it is also ugly. Wild.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago

on top of that wild crotch

Name of your sex tape.

[-] Deceptichum 18 points 3 months ago

it is also ugly

Name of my selfie

[-] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago

That pattern on TV will create awful moire patterning. Terrible design in general.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

Whennn the suit hurts your eyes / and shows way too much thigh / that's a moiré

[-] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago

That is absolutely degrading, why is it impossible to give women similar kinds of shorts as men gets?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There is a shorts option for women as well, you can see it on the far right in the picture in the article.

Sucks for women who do usually like wearing briefs but they aren't being forced to wear this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] funkless_eck 22 points 3 months ago

they should start growing their bushes out. Pubelimpics.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

I am pretty aghast at how revealing that track outfit is. It's already bad enough how short women's running shorts are compared to mens; if you have even slightly thicker thighs they can chafe pretty badly!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Oh god, the chaffing !

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 112 points 3 months ago

Not as much fun as the title, and more to the point: Lauren Fleshman, the US national champion in the 5000m in 2006 and 2010, shared even harsher criticism in an Instagram post, writing: “I’m sorry, but show me one WNBA or NWSL team who would enthusiastically support this kit. This is for Olympic Track and Field. Professional athletes should be able to compete without dedicating brain space to constant pube vigilance or the mental gymnastics of having every vulnerable piece of your body on display. Women’s kits should be in service to performance, mentally and physically. If this outfit was truly beneficial to physical performance, men would wear it.” She added: “This is not an elite athletic kit for track and field. This is a costume born of patriarchal forces that are no longer welcome or needed to get eyes on women’s sports. ... Stop making it harder for half the population @nike @teamusa @usatf.”

[-] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago

She's completely right.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

The men's team should wear the same kit in solidarity. But not when solid, you know what I'm saying?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"pube vigilence"

🫡

[-] brbposting 6 points 3 months ago

JFC Nike way to focus group

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Good, I support her and all the female athletes and think pushing these kinds of ridiculous outfits is absolutely awful.

[-] [email protected] 60 points 3 months ago
[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

I have no idea if that's a legit response BUT in the event that it is, that uniform in the pick is not the same as what they have for this next round. This is it, and it is way way way unacceptable. I used to have lingerie undies like this and I hated them, I called it the labia splitter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago

Designed by Dennis Reynolds. None of those women would fit in them anyway; their proportions are too... Realistic.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Cut to Dennis wearing the uniform

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago

They do it because ultimately, they get away with it. I understand athletes have worked their asses off to get to compete (especially in the Olympics), but at some point if they genuinely want change, they need to take a stand — either wear something less revealing, or boycott their events. Get enough people to do it, and maybe it’ll send the message.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

Camel Toelympics

[-] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

It’s all there’s left to do for the rich. They turn to their vices and indulge deeper and deeper, worse and worse.

What’s left to do when everyone sucks you off all the time and you can buy whatever else you want.

Affluenza is a cancer.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago

Sir, this is a KFC drive through...

[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

AND I SAID I WANT A FUCKING MCFLURRY PEASANT

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ThrowawayPermanente 6 points 3 months ago

The revolution starts in the workplace

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Not like this is a news community or anything

sorry for not shit posting i guess lmao

[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Great, now viewing the Olympics will be banned in Texas with the governor's war on porn with "christian" values.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I glad to hear the use of the scientifically accurate term “Hoo Haa” to describe the aforementioned thingy.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Link without annoying cookie options: https://archive.is/DC0wY

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

As a Brit, I immediately read that in a Cornish accent.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

fuck clothing sponsors, olympic competitors should just be naked like the old days.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Can they wear some sort of bike shorts or compression shorts/half tights under it?

That would at least cover their hoo haa properly...

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

They can and theres is also a shorts option for women as well, you can see it on the far right in the picture in the article.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Real headline: gamers design olympic women's track outfit for nike

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

As sus as the leotard is it's optional and they do have an option with shorts if they don't want to worry about accidentally exposing the entire world.

Don't really see a problem with it since there are other options. If you wanna show your new Brazilian to the world, you do you.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
217 points (96.6% liked)

Interesting Global News

2276 readers
119 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS