this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
318 points (98.2% liked)

Fediverse

27398 readers
537 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 78 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wow. I'm totally shocked that Facebook would launch a free VPN out of nowhere and then use it for nefarious purposes. I was sure they just wanted to help humanity. /s

[–] ogmios 40 points 4 months ago

They "trust me," dumb fucks

[–] [email protected] 48 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I bet they snoop on a lot more than just Snapchat.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

US: It's totally fine cuz we're spying on users all over the whole world. hihihi

Tiktok does it

US: That's not fair

secret documents reveal shit its companies has done for more than a decade with impunity

US: actshockedpikachuface.jpg

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

This is stupid. China bans American social media and you don't care. America does the same back and now it's a conspiracy.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't Zuck put covers on his laptop cameras?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

The FBI Director puts covers over his camera when he was testifying in Congress. Its safe to say that it should be a mandatory thing for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

In the article they said it was later extended to Amazon and YouTube

[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely disgusting. They should get sued into the ground, then through it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Only matters if fine is at least 5% Facebook revenue probably.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Individual does this -- CFPA indictment instantly.

MegaCorp does this -- Oh dear, we absolutely must meet to plan to implement a meeting to form a panel that will plan to meet to maybe ask nicely that MegaCorp stop what they're doing (or pay us lots of lobbying funds to make it go away, which it will do anyhow, just not quite as quietly as if they pay us $$$)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

What's a CFPA indictment?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Do you mean Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

The only reason this might see real legal action is that FB did this to other megacorps.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago

Its okay guys, we hear you, we see you, were gonna ban tik tok!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

Yet another example of why we need privacy laws with real teeth.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Extradite them.

Oh wait...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Is it really so hard to just doll out consequences? Holy fuck, what is it gonna take? The eroding of every instituion in America? Oh wait

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Guess they'll have to sell the company to an American buyer now!

[–] threelonmusketeers 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How is this article related to the fediverse? It doesn't even mention threads. This just seems like another "Facebook bad" article, which, while it might be true, doesn't seem directly relevant to this sublemmy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Meta runs Facebook.

Meta also runs Threads.

Threads runs on top of the ActivityPub protocol.

Some instances federate with Threads.

How is it not relevant if they're willing to buy a company and hijack traffic for numbers, what won't they do when they can just spin up a server and syphon data?