this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
637 points (98.9% liked)

Funny

6625 readers
100 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We're not in Kansas anymore, muthafuckas

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

I'm tired of these motherfucking slippers on my motherfucking feet!

[–] AMillionNames 23 points 7 months ago

The official term is involuntary manslaughter, but it would only be applicable to the Witch of the West, however it would require recklessness or negligence, neither of which were present. Then again, when Dorothy's house falls on the Witch of the East, although it's basically a death from natural disaster, she proceeds to steal a family heirloom, the ruby slippers, from the deceased witch and refuses to give them back to her kin, the Witch of the West, so there's some degree of instigation. That does not excuse how Dorothy is kidnapped and detained, plus there's the criminal intent the witch has to kill Dorothy. It's a shit show all around, but that's Kansas for you.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The first one was, at worst, manslaughter. The second was premeditated, but at the insistence and manipulation of one of Oz's super powers, so she could probably get a plea deal if she's willing to dish on Glinda.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It would be great to have a show like Drunk History and Robot Chicken and Harvey Birdman where famous characters are put on trial for their various crimes

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It is. I tried once to make the argument that Jurassic Park is, too, but I get yelled at.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What's your argument? I'm all for twisting shit to make stuff isekai but jurassic park is just an island on planet earth with revived dinos.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (4 children)

The dinos are the isekai.

"I woke up as a copy of my 65 million year old self in a land of apes."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They had no prior memories, they were born there

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

They're also not technically dinosaurs due to the heavy amounts of DNA splicing they had to do to make them viable, being more like a designer monster that resembles a dinosaur. There's a ton of non-dino DNA in them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Thank you! No one else gets it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

That's also cyberpunk from the dinos' standpoint.

a bit of nitpickingBut that would contradict trying to be at least vaguely scientific-like because no memory would have been preserved

[–] Scubus 0 points 7 months ago

Star wars is also isekai

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because to make that argument, you have to reduce the definition to the point of uselessness. Jurassic Park isn't Isekai/Stranger in a Strange Land because the island isn't a strange, unknown land. It was created by the same people/culture the main characters are from. Isekai needs an independent culture with it's own history and people.

[–] EmoDuck 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But then SAO also isn't an isekai because all it's inhabitants are just visitors from the real world and was also created by the same people/culture the main characters are from

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

You're right. SAO isn't isekai. It's just "Trapped in the game". Although the Alicization arc is isekai.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

LOTS of popular western classics are isekai. Alice in Wonderland, Peterpan, The Chronicles of Narnia, Gulliver's Travels all come to mind.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

And here I thought that a key aspect of isekai was being completely unoriginal in every way

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well she wasn't exactly controlling where that house would land, was she?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (3 children)

That's for the jury to decide

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Not really tornadoes fall under the heading of "Acts of God" in most southern districts. It would be dismissed by a judge before it ever went to trial.

Grave-robbing (taking the Ruby Slippers) on the other hand would probably be a fairly sure conviction in Kansas.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Good thing she wasn't in Kansas anymore.

[–] EmoDuck 2 points 7 months ago

Grave-robbing implies that the witch was already properly buried and that having a house land on top you you counts as a for of burial in Oz

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

If she wasn’t white, guilt would be certain.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

She doesn't really "meet" the wicked witch of the east, and it's hard to argue that she "kills" her, either, considering that was an act of god which Dorothy didn't really want to be a part of.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I remember Ted Lasso very differently

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

RIP Lee Winfrey

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago