this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
313 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18992 readers
2476 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Things got heated at a Harvard Institute of Politics event on Friday, with Manchin himself squaring up

During a Harvard Institute of Politics event held on Friday morning, a man described by some outlets as a security guard and by others as an aide physically chucked a young protester out of the room after the individual confronted Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., calling him "a sick f**k."

In video of the incident posted to X (formerly Twitter) by a group called Climate Defiance, which the protester is a member of, they write, "BREAKING: we just called Joe Manchin a sick f**k. We humiliated him in front of a herd of Harvard elites. He squared up. We held firm. Barbaric murderer, hideous fiend, he torches humanity and laughs."

As witnessed in the clip, Manchin took visible offense to the protester's heated words, standing up from his chair in what looks to be a defensive stance just prior to the aide/security guard stepping in to handle the matter on his behalf, placing both hands on the protester and shoving him to the ground.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 160 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, the tough politician's greatest nemesis: being called mean names by kids one third their age. Big Manchin' Joe was rightfully scared for his life.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago (1 children)

we humiliated him...

Yeah, I highly doubt that.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He lacks the capacity for shame needed to experience humiliation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

"His conscience was clear, he never used it."

[–] [email protected] 116 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I hope the protestor can sue the crap out of him. Police should be arresting what is clearly battery

[–] [email protected] 55 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It was an enlightened centrist lobbyist that threw the guy: https://capitolcounsel.com/team/jonathan-kott/

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You can just call him a lobbyist. Pretty sure that overrides all political positions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Political Affiliation: MONEY

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

It certainly outranks them.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Sounds a lot like assault.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is much worse than just assault, because it's also an intentional act of battery, which is a potential felony charge in Massachusetts.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago

They should throw the book at this person. (Period)

Where are all the front page stories about all the people threatened by Trump supporters. People are leaving congress. People are threatening court workers.

It gets mentioned, but not nearly commensurate with the frequency.

This is not whataboutism. Put all the bastards in jail. Quickly.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

Yeah, the protester will probably get charged lol

[–] [email protected] 82 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What is this?

You can absolutely call a politician a fuckface to their god damn face. Thats what being an American is about.

Fucking pigs.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Maybe you missed the don't taze me bro video where the guy is tackled and tazed for asking John Kerry a question.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Seems to happen to Kerry often. I remember when he was rightly called a warmonger in Germany and the police tackled the guy and when Code Pink protesters were beaten for calling out his lies about Syria.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

worth it. i hope he hears it every day for the rest of his life

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago

It's not like he cares. He knows what he is.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Always a good sign when elected officials hide from their constituents rather than, you know, stop doing awful things that said constituents rightfully abhor..

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I agree, but also you can't win everyone and some people are nuts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

you can't win everyone and some people are nuts

Sure, but the people who are nuts tend to be the cops and right wing agitator counter-protesters, not pro-palestinian protesters who just don't want their government to sponsor and provide political cover for genocide.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I agree Biden is 99% wrong on Gaza. It was disgusting months ago. I don't have words for the immorality at this point.

But, independently, what does he have to gain from public appearances?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Biden's unwillingness to use the bully pulpit is why his supporters have occasion to lament that he doesn't get credit for all the good things he's done.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

what does he have to gain from public appearances?

Well since he's technically a public figure running to retain a public-facing job and his fascist opponent already has a whole propaganda schpiel ready about him being out of the limelight to hide how he's literally crumbling to incoherent dust from age, not being seen in public would seem inherently problematic if you ask me..

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

You have to ask yourself: why does the alternative seem disadvantageous to him? He knows more than we do about his costs/benefits than we do. Again, not defending anything about him besides his self-serving calculus.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

why does the alternative seem disadvantageous to him?

Because he doesn't want to face any tough questions or people who don't worship him.

He knows more than we do about his costs/benefits.

Not really, no. Dishonesty and a lack of transparency is not the same as superior knowledge.

Again, not defending anything about him besides his self-serving calculus.

It's sounding more and more like that's EXACTLY what you're doing 🙄

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

The Biden campaign is back to its winning strategy of hiding in the basement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I feel sorry for whichever harvard minion had to invite joe machin to speak without also calling him a sick fuck.

How could anyone stand near that professional bribee without at least calling him a sick fuck?