this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
74 points (96.2% liked)

Canada

7365 readers
420 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories

πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales

πŸ—£οΈ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
74
[EDITOR'S NOTE] Canadian news is starting to vanish from Instagram. Google is next. Here's how to find CBC as that happens (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is a good reminder of just how much CBC puts out there. I am a little surprised not to see a mention of using alternative search engines like DDG or Bing, as to my knowledge those aren't blocking Canadian news corps. (Please correct me if you know differently!) I guess if the goal is to raise awareness of the content you can get without an intermediary, it makes sense.

I'm very interested to see which parties cave first in this standoff. If nothing else, I'm impressed the Canadian government had the balls to mandate this of American companies.

[–] Contextual_Idiot 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Canadian government seems to be following Australia's lead. Australia was able to make deals with Google and Meta, so Canada is probably looking for the same thing.

[–] terath 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, key word here is "make deals," which is what Australia ended up doing. They didn't just dictate terms like Canada seems to want to. The entire point of these companies banning news is to remind our government that no, you can't just dictate your terms, you actually have to negotiate. Maybe they will, we'll have to wait and see.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The one thing that makes government different than any other organization is yes they CAN just dictate the terms. That's their whole deal.

[–] terath 1 points 2 years ago

Not against foreign owned companies they cannot. As much as they would love to force these companies to both carry and pay for news, those companies can choose not to carry the news and thus not pay for it. Canada can not force them to do so.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd really like to see a CBC official Mastodon instance.

[–] terath 1 points 2 years ago

Just make a bot that reposts CBC rss feeds. I guess you might need to filter ads if they put those in-between stories, some rss feeds do.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Is one really on the internet if they're trapped inside a tech bro walled garden. The situation seems quite terrible now that people have to be told how to go to a URL as simple as cbc.ca. It's not like the internet was recently invented. This is a developed nation and one of the earlier to widely adopt internet usage. Here we are teaching people how to browse to a website. What a mess that big tech has made.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

At some level I can't really blame the tech companies for making it convenient to browse through their sites, but rather how they have used it to track and influence people. At some point everyone using the internet should have learned how to find websites they find it worthwhile to visit and use their critical thinking to identify whether a site is trash. That skill hasn't changed in decades.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Wait till you tell them about rss feeds

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago

The poor, benighted soul who heard you shouldn't get news from Facebook, and thought to themselves, "No problem, I'll just use Instagram!"

[–] can 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

CBC News has a pretty good app.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I do not need yet another app to show me web content.

[–] can 12 points 2 years ago

Good news! The website is also fully functional.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Every media organization and news outlet also has a website that people can directly connect to

With a bit of setting up, you can also use a feed aggregator in a variety of ways or services to just collect headlines to news stories and read all their headlines as they appear every day to read the news.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

With a bit of setting up

This is the problem. The path of least resistance funnels people into garbage news and conspiracy theories .

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

This is the way. Been using RSS feeds since 2005. Haven't had a piece of news delivered to me via Reddit, Facebook, Twitter or any other social media without it being in my feeds within 5 minutes. Never need to go anywhere else.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

My 83 year old Dad uses Facebook, but only for family stuff. If he wants news, he goes to CBC.ca or sometimes CTV. He still gets his local paper too.

[–] Pxtl 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Shows why Canadian news companies should be getting into the Fediverse.

[–] terath 3 points 2 years ago

The whole point of the bill that caused this is that they want money. They won't get money out of the fediverse. It was never about exposure.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Genuine question, not trying to be a snob about it…

Who actually uses Facebook and Instagram and stuff for news? It’s such a foreign idea to me that I’m interested in how many people actually get their news from these sites (as opposed to coming across it and interacting with it just because it’s there).

Are there actually people who will consume less news because of this? Is it specific demographics?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

At one point I was following a few local news accounts on instagram because I'd scroll past some content while I was already looking through the feed. It wasn't my only way of getting news, but just another form of it.

Facebook dropping news probably won't affect me much, but I can see Google being more impactful. I know some people use the news feed as their primary way of finding news, and I also click on news articles when they come up on the search. Depending on the extent of the removal, it might replace a lot of reputable news with content that isn't "news" but still fills that niche.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

I guess that’s the alarming part - if people don’t change their habits and read ads as news.

Thanks for the explanation!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I think the people most worried about there being no "news" on FB or IG, etc. are the FB and IG addicts inside the news media itself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I have never gotten my news from social media. I get my news from news media and news papers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

The CBC app is already so good, though...

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί