this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
319 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18998 readers
1963 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Joe Biden has spent the last several months laying out the reasons why it would be a terrible idea to give Donald Trump a second term in office—reasons that include everything from Trump’s assault on reproductive rights to his pledge to be a dictator only “on day one.” And on Wednesday, the president added another entry to the list: the fact that his opponent appears to have completely lost touch with reality.

Speaking to supporters at a fundraiser in San Francisco, Biden reportedly referred to Trump’s claim that he and Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny—who recently died in an Arctic penal colony—had suffered similar treatment, with the president remarking, “Some of the things that this fellow’s been saying, like he’s comparing himself to Navalny and saying that—because our country’s become a communist country, he was persecuted, just like Navalny was persecuted. I don’t know where the hell this comes from.” Biden added: “I mean, if I stood here 10, 15 years ago and said any of this, you’d all think I should be committed. It astounds me.”

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Commit him by executive order, Joe!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

An actually horrifying thought

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

This is one of the things where it sounds obviously unconstitutional, but I would not bet money on the fact that it actually is.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Of course it’s blatantly unconstitutional, one cannot be denied due process, see 14th amendment. However, that is not the poignant question. What matters is: does anyone of consequence and power give a flying shit anymore?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Just send Trump to Gitmo. There's no due process there, so there's no problem!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Joe could throw trump in prison without due process and probably tie it up in courts for at least a few weeks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Biden should throw Trump in jail, then say he has immunity since he's the president. Trump either has to take it, or set precedent against his own cases.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

A tiny part of me is hoping the supreme court does rule that presidents are immune and then biden just fucking drone strikes Mar-a-Lago and resigns before they can indict him.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Biden could even argue in good faith, that he did it to protect democracy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

This is why the supreme court cannot find that. Because that would mean the Dems have only one option left and that would be doing it first.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Would that not mean Baker acting someone is unconstitutional yet occurs daily and has for decades yet not a flying fuck has been given?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

If SCOTUS does the unexpected and rules a president has absolute immunity? Yeah, I would do this the very next moment.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

What the absolute gucking timeline of fuck

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

Committed to a supermax.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This election is gonna be a lot of elder abuse, and everyone is gonna suffer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

We really need a fucking age limit or at least a dementia test...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Oh, is that a surprise somehow Vanityfare?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Well, according to Trump, you can make that happen

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

5150 him like YayO!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Then they started flinging spoons of Jell-O at each other.

Just kidding. I know Joe's a raging bull, etc...etc...

[–] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Joe's old and moves slow, Donald's old and has a clinically diagnosable personality disorder. Trump does not share a reality with the rest of us

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Joe’s old and moves slow

So is a glacier but they can ground down entire mountains

Trump does not share a reality with the rest of us

And still there are too many that want to be part of his alternative reality

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Would be interesting if the rest of the campaigns took place in the same senior care facility.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just shuffle all of the "leadership" off, scuffling amongst themselves. Include McConnell, honestly probably Pelosi, Grassley. Eventually they'll get distracted by board games or whatever and we can figure out next steps.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I've said before that their debates will be reminiscent of the Lincoln-Douglas debates, not because of the high oratory, but because they both think they remember them.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

lets not get into mental acuity fighting, no one is ganna win there. This is just some BS middle school shit, just beat the other on the issues. And for fucking once maybe try doing the things you promise on the campaign trail, I mean you know he will, he will be dictator for a day, then maybe just a few more, you know when it feels right to give the power back.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago

There is a very very clear winner here. It might be the one eyed man being king in the country of the blind, but it's no contest at all.