this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
403 points (99.0% liked)

News

23267 readers
3184 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tom Suozzi, a former Democratic congressman, won a closely watched special House election in New York on Tuesday, narrowing the Republican majority in Washington and offering his party a potential playbook to run in key suburban swing areas in November.

His victory in the Queens and Long Island district avenged a year of humiliation unleashed by the seat’s former occupant, George Santos, and stanched a trend that had seen Republicans capture nearly every major election on Long Island since 2021.

Mr. Suozzi, 61, fended off the Republican nominee, Mazi Pilip, in a race that became an expensive preview of many of the fights expected to dominate November’s general election, especially over the influx of migrants at the border and in New York City.

Archive

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 119 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Mr. Suozzi’s comeback will have an immediate impact in Washington. After he is seated, Speaker Mike Johnson can afford to lose only two votes on any partisan bill, an unwieldy margin that could limit Republicans’ election-year legislative agenda.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Even if Johnson gets bypassed and literally any major legislation gets passed, all Republicans will take credit for it. They take credit for bills they voted against all the time.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh, they are more than welcome to take credit for Ukraine funding. No worries there. I'm sure their voters will looooove that. Israel, yep, they can have that one too. Taiwan, sure, why not? Aid for the Gazans? Yep, sure. Totally fine.

I see no issues here. lol

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

Exhibit A: the difference between policy-mindedness and partisanship. 🥇

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

At least things will be getting passed!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The Mayorkas impeachment wouldn't have happened. Funny how they scheduled that vote just in time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Brilliant point. They can do stuff. They just don't. Its like they only have the focus to do destructive things

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (4 children)

This looks like an opening. Is there any "broken clock is right twice a day" legislation that the extreme MAGA fringe wants passed that mainstream GOP doesn't that coincidentally aligns with democrat policy goals?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The GOP would actually have to pass legislation for there to be a chance for anything for them to talk about. They haven't passed meaningful legislation in years that wasn't bipartisan. They've shown that even with a majority they can't get anything done themselves. They keep scapegoating their own Speakers because of it.

It pretty much shows that the GOP can't even unite to do anything in current Congress. It is supposedly so much a shitshow that some long-time Congresspeople are considering retirement after their terms are up out of frustration.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If not legislation, then how about procedure votes?

They’ve shown that even with a majority they can’t get anything done themselves. They keep scapegoating their own Speakers because of it.

If I'm not mistaken the ouster of McCarthy from the Speakership was a bi-partisan effort with democrats and MAGA fringe GOP voting for it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The impression I got of McCarthy's ousting was that some democrats would have voted to keep him as speaker had he had the balls to ask them. But he didn't, so the democrats did what they were expected to do and voted to oust the guy from the other party.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

This is exactly what happened.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

bi-partisan effort with democrats and MAGA fringe GOP voting for it.

Well it was 208 Democrats + 8 GOP. That's not even 4% of the GOP in the House. I guess you could call that bipartisan if you want. Then there were a bunch of failed speaker nominations before Mike Johnson.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

MAGA has nothing to do with passing legislation or running the country, so no.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

MAGA congresspeople put Mike Johnson into the position he's in.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yes, this does strengthen my point

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Not that I'm aware of. A lot of the MAGA stuff is just directly opposed to democrats.

[–] Corkyskog 3 points 8 months ago

MAGA policy is if the democrats vote yay, then vote nay.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago (2 children)

So that is something like 13 out of the last 16 special elections that the GOP has lost.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, these by-elections tend to be happening in uncompetitive constituencies. This one was actually a marginal seat.

It's good, of course, but compare it to the UK where the Labour Party and Liberal Democrats have been overturning huge majorities in previously safely Conservative seats and the US Democrats seem to be the runt of the litter.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Only because you aren't thinking of the bigger picture.

With the new, fair maps in 4 states for the 2024 election, this actually is a big deal when you are talking about control of the House.

And as the article states, Democrats can pass bills with only 2 GOP defections now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

There is a theory that Democrats now have the majority of high propensity voters, such as high education voters. A decade ago it was the reverse, and Republicans would win most special elections and midterms.