this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
91 points (94.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26205 readers
1628 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 71 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nokia 3310

It'd still be charged

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There’s an entire book dedicated to answering your question: The World Without Us.

The Wikipedia article I linked summarizes a lot of the book, but I recommend reading it since the details are fascinating.

TL;DR:

The longest-lasting evidence on Earth of a human presence would be radioactive materials, ceramics, bronze statues, and Mount Rushmore. In space, the Pioneer plaques, the Voyager Golden Record, and radio waves would outlast the Earth itself.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Won't there also be evidence of raw materials that got mined out?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Probably. Metals etc. are far out of "equilibrium distribution", even if all mines collapse without a trace.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Almost certainly, depending on the time scale. Physical constructs will eventually break down, but the impact on the environment in total will likely be able to be deduced for millions of years.

For example, we already have a good record of the five previous mass extinction events, and can tie them directly to geological causes. On our current trajectory, a sixth wouldn't necessarily tie well to any other factors other than the activity of a dominant species. This is one of many factors in the proposed geological epoch of the anthropocene.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I've heard that our nuclear impact will be seen for a very very long time from all the nuclear testing we did

And plastics

And our fertilizers

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago

A sharp increase in Carbon-14 would be visible for a few thousand years.

The rest of the elements released by nuclear testing? Not so much. Cs-137, and Sr-90 both have half lives of about 30 years. That means that after about 300 years, they're both completely decayed into their daughter products.

Now, Cs-137 decays into Ba-137, which is stable. It's also naturally occurring as about 11% of all Barium.

Sr-90 decays to Yt-90, spends a few days as such and then decays to Zr-90, another naturally occurring isotope. Zr-90 is a bit over 50% of all naturally occurring Zirconium.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

You're thinking on the scale of thousands of years, you need to think on the scale of millions

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The stuff humans have left on the Moon and Mars would probably be good indicators.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I would guess that things like massive landfill dumps would be almost impossible to wipe all trace of. There's no natural process that can collect that huge number of different chemical elements in such high amounts into a single location. So even if literally everything manmade has broken down to its consistent elements, the presence of a mile-wide radius plot of earth containing every solid element in the chart would be a clear indicator that an advanced civilization must have been there.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago

They will wonder why our entire civilisation was based around plastic bags.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

A very thin smear of exhaust fumes, long-chain hydrocarbons, and rare radioisotopes.

Also a very clear mass extinction event.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ironically, our best bet is probably our space junk. Leave as much of our stuff in space and on the moon as possible.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Most stuff in space would lose orbit pretty soon and fall in the Earth's atmosphere, or into the sun (for James Webb)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But it will eventually. It just happens to be a large enough mass in a stable-ish orbit to last a long time. The same isn't true of most of our space junk.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

The moon is moving away from earth at a rate of about 1 inch per year. If the sun didn't expand and consume us first, this would likely continue for the next 50 billion years, putting the moon at more than 3x it's currentndistwncenf om earth.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The nuclear waste will be radioactive for thousands of years, it will probably be radioactive longer than our current recorded history as a whole. Think about that, ever since humans started recording our history, our nuclear waste will be radioactive longer than that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

This place is not a place of honor.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, even in millions of years, traces of human civilization should still be easily detectable by a future civilization. The geological record will contain many elements that don't occur naturally and would point to an industrial civilization. Some relics of human civilization will fossilize or otherwise be preserved. Finally, there will be well preserved human-made objects in space, either in high earth orbit or on the moon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Won't they be blasted by space radiation in the long run?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There will be strangely distributed concentrations of various materials in any sediment layer from our period, such as iron, copper, aluminum, hydrocarbons, and various minerals. A lot of these will be in relatively small areas and also laid out in clearly artificial geometric patterns, especially in straight lines.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That layer will also include, worldwide, levels of radioisotopes that do not occur naturally. The same way that there is an Iridium layer on the soils of 65MYA showing the asteroids that killed the dinosaurs, the current sediments being laid down have traces of plutonium and other materials that will exist until the sun becomes a red giant and swallow the Earth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Not to mention, the carbon dating of everything currently on the surface will have a stark difference from the carbon dating of everything currently below the surface, because nuclear power and weapons permanently offset it. They'll be like "what a strange unexplained phenomenon..." and then after they figure out how to do it themselves they'll think "OH. That's how that happened. Huh."

[–] sentient_loom 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Depends entirely on how long until the "next intelligent species to arise" (no reason to expect it ever will)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

squirrels will be next

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I watched a special years ago about what would happen to our infrastructure, buildings, etc if humans just blinked out of existence. The show start off advancing time, touching on events as they might occur. The very last thing to withstand the test of time was Mount Rushmore, due to be carved from granite. Mount Rushmore would stick around for a very very very long time and would be the last trace of us. But that's just that one TV show special's opinion, but it sounds pretty.....solid to me.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

Fertilizer is what I've heard.

Long after the weight of ages has ground our works and bones to scattered dust, the changes we've made to the nitrogen cycle will stick out in the geologic record.

The jump from base levels of nitrogen to the obviously unnaturally higher amounts that would remain in layers from our time just wouldn't have any explanation other than something did it on purpose. There's basically no way for that level of increase to occur in what is geologically the blink of an eye without industrial capacity. Or that's what I've heard.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

Micro plastics in the earth.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

There would be signs, but I don't think there is any guarantee that a new intelligent life form would care to look for such signs, or that they'd have the type of intelligence that would be able to interpret the signs of our existence and conclude that we had existed in their distant past.

At best, our existence would be one of several theories explaining abnormalities about the Earth that future intellectuals would argue about.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

The pyramids.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Any remaining Ice Sheets will have an accurate record of air emissions such as Carbon where the depth roughly equals the time since, and since just before the Industrial Revolution the amount of carbon emission shot up like the face of a cliff compared to the hundreds of millions of years before it.

[–] Tremble 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just a wee microscopic layer of plastic in the geological sediment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Earth: Now with a bright & delicious hard candy shell!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

AOL and Compuserve CDs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

There's a few random projects that aim to store bulk data and human information in durable materials.

https://www.popsci.com/technology/5d-disc-stores-500-tb-of-data/

Professor Peter Kazansky, from the ORC, says: "It is thrilling to think that we have created the technology to preserve documents and information and store it in space for future generations. This technology can secure the last evidence of our civilisation: all we've learnt will not be forgotten."

I'm learning most of the articles are all based on this guy from 2013 until now it's still been in mostly research phase though proof of concepts have been done.

I'm trying to find evidence of another thing I swear I heard about where someone had some instructions from first principals how to read the data, but all the way from something like understanding the language to data format. I listened to something in a tech podcast but can't find it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Depends on when the next intelligent species arises. Maybe they were the one that drove us to extinction!

But even if it takes a few million years, we've build massive amounts of infrastructure that won't be going away anytime soon.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

If we are talking millions of years it will become more and more unlikely that there will be anything left to find. In those timespans new geological formations happen.

Look at fossils as example. Yes, we have quite a lot of them but they stretch over a couple hundred million years, so imagen the things we don't know about these periods. Now consider that modern humanity has been around for about 12 k years and the chances of researchers finding remains of our infrastructure in many million years by chance become tiny, just like the layers of sediment containing our remains.

What's imho a lot more plausible is, that future researchers might find traces of our lasting impact on the atmosphere aka climate change in Arctic ice and wonder what caused it, prompting them to dig around in geological formations from our period which then might lead to some discovery.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The crust has a few tectonically stable regions that have never slid into the mantle. This is where we've found rocks that date all the way back to 2-3 billion-ish years. We call them geologic shields.

Our current activities would leave chemical markers in these regions that would be detectable for a very, very long time, and could come from no known natural process.

Otherwise you're right, everything else eventually slides into the mantle and gets turned back into magma over a long enough timeframe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

To be fair, the effect of stuff being cycled back into the mantle doesn't destroy every human artifact regardless, given that some of our constructs aren't even on earth. Though I'm not sure that the odds of anyone actually finding one of our space probes is that high, the solar system is a big place after all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I have really appreciated your thoughts on this question. There are many different ways that we can think about this, and I appreciate every one of the ways that you have all espoused. Bravo! Thanks for answering my rather generic question.

load more comments
view more: next ›