356
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 93 points 5 months ago

You can't have a taser, but you can sex traffic minors.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

No no, the executive branch can do it.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

Uh, he is in the legislative branch...

[-] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago
[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

I think it's more correlated with wealth.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Nah. It's legislative power. GOP can't afford to lose any more votes in the house.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

No, it's definitely wealth. We have a two tiered justice system.

[-] [email protected] 74 points 5 months ago

This can only be a publicity stunt, and at that, he was too much of a puss to have an actual gun on him.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago

It helps him get the girls into the van

[-] vaultdweller013 1 points 5 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Girls love stunt vans.

[-] [email protected] 52 points 5 months ago

Well how else is he supposed to keep those kids quiet when he flies them to his rape palace.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

I guess he had an unwilling date later.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago
[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

He’s got the wrong colored skin /s

[-] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's absolutely hilarious to me how many of the "tough guys" who think they're the most macho men on the planet have to carry a fucking weapon on them at all times.

Are you a "tough guy" for real, or do you just cosplay as one with the other incels, Matty?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

The middle school girls think it makes him look cool.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Carrying a weapon on you at all times screams *frightened coward" to me.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

If a regular citizen had a taser at airport security, they would have been held as a terrorist.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago

This is not true. C'mon. I hate Gaetz's guts. But it's not like he was wielding it at security.

People can transport weapons via checked in luggage. It wouldn't be uncommon for some distracted packer to put it in their carryon - at which point the person would be stopped and told "you can either dispose of it, or not enter the secure area. Your choice."

Unless you're brown like me, of course ;)

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

This is not true either. My boss accidentally had a bullet in his bag. No gun or anything to actually use it and they held him and threatened to arrest him. He's white btw.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

What's wild here is I had 20 bullets in my backpack that I accidentally left in there, and they let me through, and through a connecting flight, and only caught them on the flight home, and made me throw them away. I am white which could have contributed to the "toss to enter" treatment, but I did technically fly with explosives in my carry on.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

Sucks to be your boss, then, but that's pretty anecdotal. Plus you can't compare a bullet with a taser.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

I'm replying to a comment that just specified weapons in general.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Fair enough.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

It was definitely true in the Bush years. Less so now. That was a dumb time. Unlike now, which is dumb in new and unique ways.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

The twist? it was in his ass....

[-] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Airport security wouldn't be needed for that, though, because he talks out of it.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

I didn't know he played chess.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Crafty callback. Nice.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

So I've spent an embarrassing amount of time thinking "why are all these people so clueless!?" when their weapons are found at TSA etc, but JUST NOW I realized it's because they are usually waived through.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Even an idiot like pedo Gaetz should have a right to defend himself. Just stupid to bring it to the airport.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Having a taser is not the problem. Republicans forgetting where their taser or gun is at, is the problem.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Gaetz is trying really really hard to be as shit like as possible.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Well, that's not news...

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

he just wanted to be like the grandma from die hard 2.

https://youtu.be/_M7xDyttC94?si=6pyXeVAofPYBYwZD

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

“Say hello to Dr. Watts!”

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
356 points (96.6% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3680 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS