this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
211 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3827 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick had a few choice words for the public on his way out the door of the Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office

Sean Kirkpatrick was once the man in charge of a D.C.-backed agency tasked with investigating claims into unidentified anomalous phenomena, the new term for what most people still call UFOs. He stepped down from the position in December, and has now published a excoriating farewell letter in Scientific American detailing some of the reasons why.

So why did he stop hunting for UFOs on behalf of the American government? In short: Because congressional leaders believe in conspiracy theories with absolutely no substantial proof. “Our efforts were ultimately overwhelmed by sensational but unsupported claims that ignored contradictory evidence yet captured the attention of policy makers and the public, driving legislative battles and dominating the public narrative,” Kirkpatrick said in Scientific American.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sorrybookbroke 8 points 9 months ago

I don't know man, sounds like something an alien would say

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Shout-out to the All Domain Research Office's reporting website, that requires being a federal employee and submitting unclassified proof.

Nothing worth knowing will be unclassified, that's his basis for "nobody submitted any proof"

https://www.aaro.mil/AARO-Reporting-Information/

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Submitting classified information would be illegal. How in the world could they require anything else?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Was that the only way to reach out or submit proof?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's the only one I could find.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Also, AARO didn’t even have a website until August 31 2023. Sean Kirkpatrick admitted to speaking with people like David Grusch prior to officially starting his role. But, since these didn’t go through official reporting channels they never got reviewed. DOD even released a report admitting to failing at documenting UAP.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

And as expected the conversation shifts from the facts gathered by the article to every other kind of speculation possible. Didn’t even have time to make popcorn.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Here's the link to the actual letter, for any one curious

it's worth a read. Though, ask yourself... given the capability of interstellar travel, and knowing humans had the psychotic tendency to nuke themselves... multiple times... Would you visit here on vacation?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I just want to know what the lights on all those UFOs people see are for. Too dark in space?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Aliens obey FAA regulations regarding navigation lights.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

All these sweaties have no imagination.

I dont need faster than light travel, I just have to have developed earlier than you.

You know what a Von Newman probe is? Its a machine that is capable of self replication.

So lets say that thousands of years ago an alien species identifies solar systems with planets inside their habitable zones and launches Von Newman probes at them - no faster than light travel required.

Also explains crashes, the mini-probes, built by the "mothership" are literally that - expendable.

We are literally talking about doing something similar to Alpha Centurai

https://www.sciencealert.com/nasa-selects-a-wild-plan-to-swarm-proxima-centauri-with-thousands-of-tiny-probes

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You know what a Von Newman probe is?

No, please do tell us what a Von "Newman" probe is.