this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
656 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

9978 readers
1946 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 168 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Even cooler, at 75 digits you can calculate the circumference of your mom

[–] [email protected] 43 points 7 months ago

Joke’s on you, I only needed 69 digits to calculate the circumference of your dad’s cock

[–] [email protected] 60 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Why would you miss the opportunity to make the web page continue computing pi to as many digits as you feel like scrolling down to expose though

[–] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago

Whoa. No spoilers for Contact please.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 7 months ago (4 children)

At work we have a scale sensitive to the 1/10,000 of a gram. 4 decimal digits. It's so sensitive it needs to be encased in a box so tiny connection currents don't make it go frantic! Even in the box the number changes a lot. 15 0s is nutty.

[–] threelonmusketeers 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

connection currents

Convection currents?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Yes. Heckin Gboard.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Mine can tell if I'm sitting next to it's desk or not. I've come to the conclusion it's the deformation of the ground the desk is sitting on.

It's really a silly amount of precision for what I use it for. But It's so fun to lock g on .0000, even if only for a few seconds. Anyone who has a target of a specific amount of 0s can do it themselves. After the first 2 shits pretty random.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago

Haha 3 go brr

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I like to use 16, just to be safe.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Much more round than 17 at least

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

It’s a bit far off. You should round down to 3 at the very least.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Dope. I just memorized it to 50 digits. Good to know for my intents and purposes it doesn't matter at all anyway.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hey, cheer up, it doesn't matter for anyone's intents and purposes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

No no no. The error compounds every time you math so if you math a lot at 40 digits you might end up with like 30 digits of correct precision. Totally unacceptable. Literally unplayable.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Still, we can't proof that Pi^Pi^Pi^Pi is an integer or not, since we don't know enough digits.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's definitely not an integer seeing as it has a fractional component. Do you mean if it's rational or not?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No, we can't proof if its an integer or not. If you can proof it, you are up for a great career in mathematics: https://www.spektrum.de/kolumne/ist-pi-hoch-pi-hoch-pi-hoch-pi-eine-ganze-zahl/2203268

(Unfortunately only found this german article, but maybe translation works)

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Diameter of a hydrogen atom is all well and good, but how many digits of pi will we need to be accurate to a Planck Length?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Honestly probably not that many more. My guess since I'm too lazy to do the math is less than 100.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The diameter of a hydrogen atom is over 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 plank lengths.

So based on this post I have no idea.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Well that's only 26 more digits, so we're probably good at 100 digits of pi. [citation needed]

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

log_10(size of observable universe / planck length) = 61.74... so like 63 digits of precision for everything are enough

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

Math is just runes and you can't convince me otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

At my last job I was bored so I wrote sql server functions to perform standard math operations on varchar(max) and used them to build factorial tables which I then used to iteratively calculate pi. I think I got up to around 100 digits before I got yelled at for bogging down the server and had to stop.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

There's a 9 repeating 6 times in there which I'd think is a pretty rare occurrence in pi. I wonder what the longest occurrence of a repeating digit is.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Pi is infinite so every combination/string of numbers is in there, if we calculated enough you could find a billion 2s next to each other

You can look through the first trillion here

https://archive.org/details/pi_dec_1t

Though it’s a bunch of downloading

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Not necessarily. It could just become a series of 1's repeating forever. Nothing would require it to contain all strings of numbers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

It could just become a series of 1’s repeating forever

If that happens in a number, then it is rational. Pi is not rational, so that will never happen in pi.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Looked it up, and it's apparently called the Feynman point after Physicist Richard Feynman (though the story behind that attribution is disputed). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_nines_in_pi?wprov=sfla1

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

On a long enough string I'm guessing... Infinite? Pi isn't a pattern so does it follow the same "if monkeys hade an infinite amount of time to type at a typewriter they'd type Shakespeare"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Why stop at 1 billion?... Let's go for a trillion, just because we can.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

we do what we must because we can

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

For the good of all of us, except the ones who are dead

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

But there's no sense crying over every mistake

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

"Only" using 15 digits is still pretty insane

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

You get that level of precision in a standard "double" floating point number. So that's basically the normal level of precision you get without trying.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

M_PI in math.h is like 20 digits. I'm surprised they just don't do that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Google suggests that excel uses 15. So even college students working on any old STEM degree are probably using 15 digits.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

I memorized it to a hundred digits for a bet so I'm set for life.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Just one more digit bro, imagine how many things youd discover bro, just one more, one more and it will be so much safer bro, It would help all mission just use 16digits bro

load more comments
view more: next ›