this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
291 points (95.9% liked)

News

22839 readers
3708 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Supreme Court on Tuesday passed up a chance to intervene in the debate over bathrooms for transgender students, rejecting an appeal from an Indiana public school district.

Federal appeals courts are divided over whether school policies enforcing restrictions on which bathrooms transgender students can use violate federal law or the Constitution.

In the case the court rejected without comment, the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an order granting transgender boys access to the boys’ bathroom. The appeal came from the Metropolitan School District of Martinsville, about 30 miles (48 kilometers) southwest of Indianapolis.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 76 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In the case the court rejected without comment, the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an order granting transgender boys access to the boys’ bathroom.

So, meanwhile, transgender individuals win. At least that's something. 👍🏻

With any luck, this will hold untill the rest of the nation follows suit.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Only in those circuits where the court has allowed students to use the bathroom of choice. There are several circuits that voted to deny this. Your rights now depend on where you live in the country until either the SCOTUS one days takes it up or some sort of Title IX changes force it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

With this court the country might be better off without them weighing in. Those fucks are likely to make it so the whole country has even more hostile laws.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Wouldn't want to reveal any bigotry during an election year.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Have you ever seen an election year?

Revealing the bigotry is basically the point. Trump talked about immigrants poisoning the blood of the country and it made him more popular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Pretty sure they don’t give a shit about revealing bigotry when ever they feel like it. In fact it’s a feature for the right

[–] Salix 48 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (13 children)

I wish there were more non-gendered restrooms.

The one's I've been to usually has shared sinks and has stalls that fully enclosed, as in you can't look under the stall. Most restrooms in the US, you can see under the stall in front and from an adjacent stall.

And the urinals is usually in a separate area of the restrooms.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

This, these are the best bathrooms anyways. I'd rather not listen to someone on the phone with someone else while using the restroom, lol. Animals, man.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If the lower courts are divided, isn't it the job of the Supreme Court to make it clear?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They kinda have made it clear though. By rejecting the appeal, they're saying that the 7th Circuit Court's decision stands.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

Except the ~~Fourth~~ Eleventh Circuit went the other direction with an almost identical Florida school policy, so the question of "Is it ok under the US Constitution for schools to force transgender students to use a particular bathroom?" has a different answer depending on where you live, which is the exact kind of thing the Supreme Court is supposed to deal with.

e; Whoops, had the wrong court and wrong case. That's been updated now, but for the record here's the older case I had been linking to

https://www.courthousenews.com/11th-circuit-rules-florida-schools-transgender-bathroom-policy-unconstitutional/

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Except that they aren't overriding the other courts, so really they are saying that it's up to every circuit to set their own standard.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Typically, yes. Now, not so much.

They're saving all their energy for the upcoming craziness if/when Trump is elected President while in prison.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

Of course it's southern indiana. 100‰ regressive region bordering 100% regressive states.

I hate my state.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

upheld an order granting transgender boys access to the boys’ bathroom.

Why is it only focusing on 1 gender?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago

Probably because the lawsuit was filed on behalf of a transgender boy.

The case originally required John R. Wooden Middle School in Martinsville to allow a seventh-grader identified only as A.C. to have access to the restroom while litigation continued.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Always think its odd they want someone like this or this in the women's washroom...

[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago (8 children)

Ultimately, what it boils down to is that they want to force trans people to de-transition, go back into the closet, and hopefully kill themselves. The pain and aggravation caused by these stupid bathroom laws is quite literally the point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The cruelty is the point… They don’t want us to exist

It’s really fucking stressful being under a bathroom law. There aren’t correct choices. It’s supposed to be either committing a misdemeanor or getting the shit kicked out of you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

I wonder why the Pope told them to take a pass for now.

load more comments
view more: next ›