Do people still watch the SOTU in any significant numbers? I have to admit I haven't watched one in years. I don't really see the point.
this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
60 points (88.5% liked)
politics
19308 readers
2905 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I haven't watched one in a while, but it's impossible to get away from the reporting about it.
I watch them occasionally when I feel like it's an important moment. I'll probably watch this one.
Why would you want to tamp down anxiety?
Ramp it up so people are more willing to get out and vote.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
WASHINGTON — Advisers grappling with President Joe Biden’s stubbornly low poll numbers and pressure from Democrats to shake up his strategy are planning a far more aggressive approach in coming weeks, with a keen focus on what they see as a high-stakes opportunity and hurdle to clear: the State of the Union address.
The campaign feels the speech was successful in commanding significant attention, which they will reinforce with Monday’s address about political violence that Biden will deliver at Mother Emanuel AME Church in South Carolina, the site of a deadly 2015 shooting that targeted Black churchgoers.
Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris will pick up their pace of travel — some campaign, some official — with a particular focus on the early-voting states in the Democratic primary calendar: South Carolina, Nevada and Michigan — the latter two also important general election battlegrounds.
Bruce Reed, the deputy White House chief of staff, has been leading a review process in the administration for weeks focused on identifying policy priorities for this year, an undertaking that will help shape the speech as well.
And he’ll have a chance to continue to highlight bipartisan initiatives under the umbrella of his “Unity Agenda” — enhancing access to mental health services, supporting veterans and combatting fentanyl — where additional progress can be made this year.
Similarly, Biden advisers felt that in his speech near Valley Forge on Friday, some of the best moments were again largely unscripted, as he flashed what they said was genuine anger when veering from prepared remarks that cataloged past Trump comments denigrating veterans and expressing admiration for foreign dictators.
The original article contains 1,384 words, the summary contains 269 words. Saved 81%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
President Biden is literally losing to a fucking wet noodle in current polling.
He is pathetic and needs to step aside. He’s a mediocre less than lukewarm president…. The only thing he has going for him is that he is not Trump.
Step aside. But he won’t. And we will have our first sitting President serving his country with a fucking ankle monitor living under White House arrest.
He's literally the best president we've had in the past 40 years. I'm sorry you don't like him, but he's taken a deeply divided nation and managed to push through some of the most progressive reforms in my lifetime.
He's done far more with far less than any President in my lifetime. You may have to go back to Lincoln before you find a similar political landscape.
All the major union successes are possible because of his support. The funding for green initiatives in the US is literally the largest that's ever pushed through anywhere.
He took control of the most mismanaged government in history at the height of a pandemic against a split Congress that would as soon spit in his face rather than give him a win. The supreme court is obviously partisan and eager to undo everything he's accomplishing, but somehow he keeps making progress.
Yeah, he's done some really stupid stuff, especially his support of Israel in the face of Palestinian genocide. He's not perfect and I want him held accountable for that stuff as well.
That said, I genuinely think history will look very kindly upon him, should our country not completely self-destruct. He has managed one of the most challenging climates a president can face and has pulled off genuinely historic wins. He's a consummate politician in the best way possible.
He’s literally the best president we’ve had in the past 40 years.
..and that’s when I stopped reading.
In all seriousness, who's better? I think the only serious contender is Obama, who doubtless accomplished a lot of important things, but also had a lot of political naivete and struggled to navigate a similarly divided Congress.
Clinton runs a distant third, but had a solid economical and political landscape and basically didn't mess anything up too badly. I guess H. W. Bush would be fourth, but his single term made it clear he was anything other than dynamic or compelling even at the time. W. Bush was downright devastating for our political and economic standing. Reagan is basically why we are where we are today. He still enjoys too much goodwill for how disastrous he was for the US.
Obama 100% it ain’t even close, Jack.
He met the moment. I have plenty of gripes (ie not prog enough), but he was a solid leader for the country. Ironically, I think much of this MAGA shit is fallout from having a competent black man as president. AND he wanted to give you healthcare?! Half the country’s brains exploded trying to figure out how free healthcare could be a bad thing
I think that's a really fair argument to make. I agree that having a black man in office drove half the country insane. I think Obama was a great communicator, inspirational figure and his healthcare reforms were deeply important.
This
I love how comments like yours, refuting comments like theirs, never seem to have a response. Good write up, thank you.