this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
64 points (95.7% liked)

World News

32519 readers
435 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago

"The Meissner effect (or Meißner–Ochsenfeld effect) is the expulsion of a magnetic field from a superconductor during its transition to the superconducting state when it is cooled below the critical temperature. This expulsion will repel a nearby magnet. " - from wikipedia. I had to look it up.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'm not even smart enough to understand this headline

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Superconductor. It's baa-aaack!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And how is this different than LK-99, which was pretty conclusively proven to not be superconductive?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LK-99

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lots of geaphs instead of a photo of a hovering piece of metal. And they are more careful with wording, 'possible Meissner effect' is less headline-catching than 'wow we discovered a superconductor'

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, the last one was sensationalized to the point it felt like dishonesty (and, quite possibly, was). But when something like this comes up, it’s still important to put it out there. The more eyes on it, the better.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I never did have to pay out the 100:1 odds (or whatever I was offering) to anyone from day 1 of the previous announcement...

I have no more faith in this one, so I'll go 100 to 1 odds again, that this will not result in room temperature super conductors. Anyone want to take me up on this?

If it turns out I'm wrong I promise I'm good for it (if room temperature super conductivity is a thing I'll happily give away all of my life's savings, as money will quickly become meaningless), who wants to give me their money?

[–] stepintomydojo 6 points 11 months ago

I'll bet you one upvote, and I'll pay it right now!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you’re confident why not throw out 1M:1? I’ll take that bet with you. 100:1 sounds like you’re not that confident.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Because I hold out hope it'll happen some day.

And within a decade of that day, if it comes from easily fabricated materials, money will mean nothing, and I don't care to fight with the crazies who will try to be hoarding it. A few thousand, or hundreds of thousands, would probably be easy to acquire, millions feels like too much work, even if it is worthless. I'm thinking about my future (dream) spare time (also a dream), and I don't want to commit future me to coming up with those amounts. I'm sure future me will have a few hundred for anyone if anyone ever took me up on my offer.

So my offer stands at 100:1, because I'm serious about paying out on it when it happens, when else do you get genuine offers at those odds? Give me your dollars.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

A potential "room-temperature" semiconductor?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There are many room-temperature semiconductors, for example silicon.

Meissner effect is related to superconductors

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Pretty much all my semiconductors operate well above room temperature! (relatively)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Oh no, a potential revolution in technology, again. How tedious.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

copper substituted lead apatite is literally what lk-99 was. Obviously the exact number and process could be different but colour me extremely skeptical after how that played out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Call me when it gets past being a headline in some tech journal.