"news" ... "content" ... both terms used loosely when talking Instagram.
this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
139 points (95.4% liked)
World News
38531 readers
1923 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, trash article.
But that's the norm.
I didn't know Instagram was Canada's sole source of news. You learn something new every day.
There's literally no other source. It's an information desert the entire day.
Trying to post content just to help out and keep things going sure is a job for bots that don't have to deal with responses
Trusted news platform Instagram
Making themselves irrelevant for the win!
Oh no, .... anyway ...
“It’s an interesting experience to be editor in chief of a news organization and yet locked out of your own news account and prevented from accessing the great work your teams produce for the platform every day,” Fenlon told Vox in an email.
So you make content directly for instagram and not because you have journalistic integrity and a story to tell?
“It also gave me a real glimpse of what the future might look like if Meta and Google make good on their threats to drop news from their platforms in Canada,” Fenlon said. “Our focus now is to ensure Canadians know where else they can go to get CBC journalism should they be suddenly cut off by Meta or Google, including by raising awareness of our free news app and websites.”
Oh no! I have to do the marketing myself!!! The horror!!!
The new Canadian law is modeled on a controversial Australian law, the News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code, which went into effect in 2021. Google and Meta’s responses to that law were similar threats to pull links, but both companies ended up making payments to some news organizations. The Australian government estimates that news outlets got AU$200 million, although it doesn’t know that for sure — nor does it know how that money was distributed — because the companies were allowed to keep those figures private. Even so, other countries, like Canada, likely assumed they’d get similar results with similar laws and were less apt to take Google and Meta’s threats seriously.
So it actually DOES work?
I fail to see the issue.
Pretty sure we'll be better than fine.
Canadian News agencies are really shooting themselves in the foot here, and then crying about it. This is a perfect example of them wanting their cake and eating it too.
What Canadian News is concerned about is social media platforms are summerizing news content and news articles, this means users/consumers do not need to leave social media platforms (and read articles on the news site directly).
This means news agencies do not get their add revenue on their own news sites. Instead social media sites get this add revenue instead. Thus profiting off content created by news agencies.
Now where it's really stupid, news agencies also want to prevent social media sites and maybe even search engines from providing links to news sites without paying a fee to the news agencies for doing so.
This would prevent users on sites to follow a link (maybe even posted by a user) to a news site to read a article. Social media sites make no add revenue from linking as it directs users away from their site, but from summarizing articles and keeping users on their site they do.
IMO whoever wrote this law does not understand the internet or how it work. They also fail to realize the internet is inherently built on linking to sites.
I do agreed social media sites like Google/Facebook/twitter/instagram/Lemmy? should pay a fee when summerizing news articles for users especially if these sites benefit from increased add revenue of these articles, but also asking for payment when links are created is going to far.
Oh my! What should I do to get this passed in my state?
Consuming news media is bad for mental health, this move is good news for Canadians.