this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
-22 points (10.7% liked)

Conservative

386 readers
4 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

True, it appears that Santos is a liar who cheated campaign donors out of thousands of dollars so he could fund a tacky, degenerate lifestyle buying luxury clothes and subscribing to online pornography. (Yes, Santos paid for something that is free, but I’m not defending him as a genius.) He’s been charged with serious crimes, and he’s probably someone I’d never let near my kids or borrow a ten-spot. But he hasn’t been convicted of anything. And Republicans, with a 14-seat majority, are in no position to be shedding votes. What’s the rush? Santos is up for reelection in a year anyway. Until then, why not just hold off on any votes related to OnlyFans?

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

ALL Americans benefit when their elected officials show that they actually have a spine and some ethical standards. That’s the case regardless of which political party is involved.

[–] spacecowboy 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Regardless of what color tie this charlatan wears, I hope everyone in this sub can agree that he has no place in government. He is a fraud.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This guy is embarrassing. Hopefully he does not get voted in again.

[–] No1RivenFucker -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't give a fuck if I'm voting for Mr. Crime himself, so long as he's a reliable vote in congress.

[–] spacecowboy 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Edit: On second thought, I am not even going to engage with you. You aren’t worth a “conversation”.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Republicans be like criminals are A-OK as long as they vote for our side.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Quite literally the argument in the article. It's shameless!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Yes I know some and they are firmly in a "the ends justify the means" mindset.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

But he hasn’t been convicted of anything

It's a pretty well-attested principle of conservativism that you can't charge an office-holder, a future office-holder, or someone standing as candidate for office. Expelling him from Congress is the only way he can be charged, so of course that had to happen first.

I mean, otherwise it's a perfect circle of legal immunity, right? Can't expel a politician who hasn't been convicted; can't convict a politician who hasn't been expelled.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

guess democrats aren't americans then.