524
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 75 points 7 months ago

Someone didn't remember the Alamo!

[-] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

The Alamo was for Texas independence that just so happened to be supported by the US and Texas just so happened to join them afterwards

[-] darth_helmet 17 points 7 months ago

Or the revolutionary war. Pretty fundamental.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

Technically the United States bought Texas and the rest of the Western States, after a war with Mexico.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago

after a war with Mexico

after a war

war

[-] prettybunnys 9 points 7 months ago

The technicality they’re using is that the land was purchased after the war as opposed to taken as a result of the war.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Yes, but that land would not have been "sold" if they hadn't lost the war. The war was fought to conquer land, and the payment was for war "reparations".

The U.S. agreed to pay $15 million for the physical damage of the war and assumed $3.25 million of debt already owed by the Mexican government to U.S. citizens

Wiki

[-] [email protected] 74 points 7 months ago

Yes, that is correct. We either purchased the land or found ourselves the owners in mysterious ways after special military operations. /s

[-] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Russia/Israel is that you?

[-] [email protected] 58 points 7 months ago

There are a whole lot of dead Native Americans who sure as hell thought we were at war with them.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 7 months ago

This is the woke mob trying to repaint history. The settlers arrived and invited the native Americans to dinner and the native Americans taught the settlers about "maize" (which means corn) and then the settlers asked they would move to the very cool reservations where they could have the casinos and the native Americans were like "yeah bruh."

[-] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

It is not new. Many countries do not teach the full extent of their dangerous past(cough Britain cough). A very specific example I remember is when a group of white folks overthrew the local government(a party called Fusionists) in the town of Wilmington, North Carolina. For a very long time, information about it was kept under wraps and to this day, people on the wrong side of history have had places named after them in their honor.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Other than a few small skirmishes, what have the British done? I mean it's one small island, how many countries could it oppress? 10?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

Land's cursed. Almost as if America was built on top of an ancient Native American burial ground or something.

[-] [email protected] 47 points 7 months ago

I think we acquired much of the south after a war with the south

[-] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago

We already owned that land and they tried to steal it.

However, war is literally how we founded the country.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Of all the wars we fought, you picked the one that wasn't about conquering land, and was started by the Confederacy btw

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago

don't write him off as stupid. this isn't a person trying to be correct and failing. this is a person trying very hard to establish a world in which the truth is irrelevant, and instead from moment to moment the truth is whatever they need it to be in order to justify their positions and actions.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Ah yes, Steven Colbert's "truthiness" still holds true in 2023.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago

Mexico: "Say whaaaaaaaaaa!?!"

[-] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago

The Mexican-American disagreement.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

A special military operation

[-] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago

If only he or his constituents cared about facts or competence.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago

Lol what a great title. These chumps need more of it.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago

Puerto Ricans: "Why the fuck do you think we speak Spanish, pendejo?"

[-] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'd love to see Puerto Rico to become a state, just because I think it'd be cool, but I wouldn't blame them one bit for looking at the asshats on the mainland and wanting to get away. Either way, their current status shouldn't continue.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

I think a successful completion of a deep national and international history course together hard exams should become a prerequisite for any political office in the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Well you know what they say about Kevin...he's stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Embarrassment upon embarrassment upon embarrassment upon...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
524 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3680 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS