353
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 53 points 4 months ago

There is something extremely creepy about her tone of voice and body language. One second it feels like she is trying to convince you that she is genuine but she tries too hard which immediately make you think she is faking it. All of a sudden she sounds angry in a very serious way which makes me think she is a psychopath and she about to stab me in the neck with an ice pick. My immediate instinctive reaction is to stop the video. Last time I was this creeped out was watching Anthony Hopkins' performance in Silence of the Lamb. Of course that was just really good acting of a fictional character and this is a real life person which makes it even more disturbing.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago

And through the whole thing she's using her submissive wife voice https://jesspiper.substack.com/p/the-fundie-baby-voice

[-] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago

It sounded like she was out of breath and being held at gun point lmao. Fellas this is like the end game of don't stick your dick in crazy.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I bet this one is a total nut in the sack, but given my anecdotal experiences - it's never worth it. Definite bunny boiler vibes...I get the same vibes from Boebert, BTW. The fact that she was having a grope sesh in public was probably the least surprising Boebert news, ever.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

It legit looked like something Vaught made to defend Homelander in The Boys. It was laughably bad.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

Show me your “There is no war in Ba Sing Se!” face.

[-] crazyCat 12 points 4 months ago

It was so disturbing I couldn’t physically make myself watch it, and I’m a news junkie obsessed with this crap.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

I had to turn it off halfway through. My kid was playing switch and said Daddy, what's she talking about? And I had to turn it off out of fear that he would take any of it at face value. I told him she was lying to try to get votes and turned it off.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Last time I was this creeped out was watching Anthony Hopkins' performance in Silence of the Lamb.

I had the same feeling watching it, and there's a reason for it.

Filming the movie, Anthony Hopkins and the director and editor collaborated around making sure he basically never fucking blinks on camera. It causes a very unsettling effect when there's long periods of not blinking.

Katie seems to have inadvertently adopted the same technique. I'll take Marco Rubio grabbing water like a man dying in the desert any day over this creepy Stepford wives thing.

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
353 points (98.1% liked)

politics

18138 readers
4234 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS