Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53370 readers

760 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

💰 Please help cover server costs.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

964

Warner Bros. is now erasing games as it plans to delist Adult Swim-published titles (www.polygon.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

227 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Warner Bros. Discovery is telling developers it plans to start “retiring” games published by its Adult Swim Games label, game makers who worked with the publisher tell Polygon. At least three games are under threat of being removed from Steam and other digital stores, with the fate of other games published by Adult Swim unclear.

The media conglomerate’s planned removal of those games echoes cuts from its film and television business; Warner Bros. Discovery infamously scrapped plans to release nearly complete movies Batgirl and Coyote vs. Acme, and removed multiple series from its streaming services. If Warner Bros. does go through with plans to delist Adult Swim’s games from Steam and digital console stores, 18 or more games could be affected.

News of the Warner Bros. plan to potentially pull Adult Swim’s games from Steam and the PlayStation Store was first reported by developer Owen Reedy, who released puzzle-adventure game Small Radios Big Televisions through the label in 2016. Reedy said on X Tuesday the game was being “retired” by Adult Swim Games’ owner. He responded to the company’s decision by making the Windows PC version of Small Radios Big Televisions available to download for free from his studio’s website.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 84 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This practice feels like something that should be illegal. Effectively it is destroying art that hundreds or thousands of people worked hard to make, for the sake of fiddling the books of the owning company that commissioned it.

If you "write it off" to be worth zero, it should either become freely available abandonware, or can be claimed as the intellectual property of those that worked on it. Otherwise it is evident that there is some value to be had and therefore tax fraud to claim it has none.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I agree with you. If a company writes off something in order to make it with zero, then that thing should immediately fall into the public domain.

[–] Corkyskog 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You would have to have another law that says that anything significantly devalued must be able to be purchased for the stated value. Otherwise they will just say it's worth $1.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

It's crazy that WB is getting away with blatant tax fraud. I can't claim my house is worth $0 in order to pay no taxes yet WB can say, "This media is worth $0 for tax purposes."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i wonder if devs would rather have their work eventually erased like it never existed and never pirated or preserved and appreciated by people

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Back when WB threatened to block the release of a finished series on HBO Max (Summer Camp Island), the creator more or less threatened to leak it herself. I think most devs would feel the same. At least I would. Not like it's making them any money either way.