Lemmy.World Announcements

29079 readers

209 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to [email protected] e-mail.

Report contact

DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport
Email [email protected] (PGP Supported)

Donations 💗

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Join the team

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

230

Redundant communities across instances (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

250 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As a new reddit exile, I may be misunderstanding this.

In theory something like a !gaming community could crop up on multiple large instances, especially during the mass exodus while instances are getting hammered with spikes in volume.

If that's the case, we'll have fragmented communities across instances. Is there any way besides subscribing to each of them to combine them into a sort of multi-reddit type aggregation? Or is this considered a temporary (albeit important to adoption) problem during the crazy stages?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually think it is good to have alternatives

in your example, r/gaming was the largest gaming sub but I was subscribed to r/games because I enjoyed the content and discussion there more

each instance/community will have its own culture and each user can decide which one fits their style better

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem there is that I don't want to have to, nor have time, to sift through 80 'r/gaming' communities to find which one is the one that 'fits' me.

The analogy I'd use is do you want to goto a restaurant with a 2 page menu of food, or 100 pages to choose from? From a user experience, most people will be far more comfortable and happy with the 2 page limited menu that guides your decision vs too open of a choice.

Too much choice is a real problem, and leads to people more often than not choosing to just leave if there is no real guided options.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think you'll have to sift through that many options. There's going to be an obvious choice that has 5-10x more subscribers than the next one. Sure that isn't the case right now, but overtime that's what it will look like. I can only imagine that reddit had similar issues early on too.