Politics

361 readers

264 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kersploosh

pelespirit

Warnings of the impact of fertility treatments in Alabama rush in after frozen embryo ruling (apnews.com)

submitted 10 months ago by pelespirit to c/politics

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Alabama Supreme Court has ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law, a decision critics said could have sweeping implications for fertility treatment in the state.

The decision was issued in a pair of wrongful death cases brought by three couples who had frozen embryos destroyed in an accident at a fertility clinic. Justices, citing anti-abortion language in the Alabama Constitution, ruled that an 1872 state law allowing parents to sue over the death of a minor child “applies to all unborn children, regardless of their location.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Estiar 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

How are you supposed to charge a baby with manslaughter or charge the father when he just contributed sperm? I get your mood, but that's not a winnable case for the prosecution.

I can see a tort law case like wrongful death happening, (that's the case happening here) That's not a criminal case however unless one wants to prosecute criminal negligence in another case

[–] Brocken40 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I see no reason we can't charge the baby as an adult, it was premeditated.

[–] pelespirit 1 points 10 months ago

The ga ga goo goo defense.