Politics

358 readers

164 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kersploosh

pelespirit

Warnings of the impact of fertility treatments in Alabama rush in after frozen embryo ruling (apnews.com)

submitted 10 months ago by pelespirit to c/politics

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Alabama Supreme Court has ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law, a decision critics said could have sweeping implications for fertility treatment in the state.

The decision was issued in a pair of wrongful death cases brought by three couples who had frozen embryos destroyed in an accident at a fertility clinic. Justices, citing anti-abortion language in the Alabama Constitution, ruled that an 1872 state law allowing parents to sue over the death of a minor child “applies to all unborn children, regardless of their location.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Brocken40 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If they really valued life they would immediately send the baby and father to the state pen for manslaughter if the mother dies during child birth.

[–] Estiar 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

How are you supposed to charge a baby with manslaughter or charge the father when he just contributed sperm? I get your mood, but that's not a winnable case for the prosecution.

I can see a tort law case like wrongful death happening, (that's the case happening here) That's not a criminal case however unless one wants to prosecute criminal negligence in another case

[–] Brocken40 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I see no reason we can't charge the baby as an adult, it was premeditated.

[–] pelespirit 1 points 10 months ago

The ga ga goo goo defense.