this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
897 points (99.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53370 readers
736 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

12 years ago, talking about piracy isn’t incriminating so why do the big movie companies need their info? So they can potentially intimidate them for more info they potentially don’t have?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really no idea why that timeline. In 2010 I got an email from whatever ISP I was using at the time politely asking me to stop torrenting music. They basically said, hey we see you're doing this, please stop or you can't have internet through us anymore. That is when I learned what vpns and tor browser's are for.

Seems absolutely bonkers that any corporation would be digging back that far for media pirates. Absolute waste of time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I got a similar email once from my ISP, but it was more of a "this is your first and final warning".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They might be looking for something specific. Like they are investigating an individual, or network of individuals, and this is just a piece of that investigation. I doubt they are asking for this to randomly look for opportunities to charge people with a crime related to piracy.

[–] prole 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If only we had legal avenues to obtain information from private companies.... Oh well.

If you have a valid reason to investigate people, then you can get a fucking warrant. If your investigation isn't into an actual criminal act, then maybe you don't really need that data so bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed. Glad Reddit seems to be doing the right thing here by acknowledging this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The time it would take to ask for these specific users and the research needed wouldnt amount to the number they would bring in if this would just be a shake down, I would guess you are right

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

For real. And even if they were to find the users, which is a longshot, those people could say, "no one tells the truth on the internet."

This fishing expedition is a waste of resources.