this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
45 points (94.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7601 readers
957 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The cause was easy enough to identify: Data parsed by Kuhls and her colleagues showed that drivers were speeding more, on highways and on surface streets, and plowing through intersections with an alarming frequency. Conversely, seatbelt use was down, resulting in thousands of injuries to unrestrained drivers and passengers. After a decade of steady decline, intoxicated-driving arrests had rebounded to near historic highs.

... The relationship between car size and injury rates is still being studied, but early research on the American appetite for horizon-blotting machinery points in precisely the direction you’d expect: The bigger the vehicle, the less visibility it affords, and the more destruction it can wreak.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

WTF? Seatbelt use is down?? I'd be really curious to see a Venn diagram plotting anti-maskers with the mind-numbingly stupid people who would voluntarily choose not to wear a seatbelt in the face of decades of science and societal pressure.

Seriously, hearing that seatbelt use it down to me is as shocking as when I was watching "Anchorman" and they were walking in the park and just dropped all their trash on the ground. Except that movie was parodying the way people used to think in the 70's. This is real life.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Darwinism at work.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Per the article:

Conversely, seatbelt use was down, resulting in thousands of injuries to unrestrained drivers and passengers.

Federal stats show that seatbelt use dropped a little in 2020 and 2021 as compared with previous years, and then came back up in 2022, with a huge jump in seatbelt-non-use contributing to fatalities in 2020

More recent data isn't available yet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The timing coincides with COVID so I wonder if it really is the whole anti-masker "government can't tell me what do and besides I'm immortal!" mentality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Could be; could also be that infection alters peoples behavior.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or just that people who would wear seatbelts drove less because they're generally more worried about their health, and the people who don't wear seatbelts didn't change driving behavior.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh interesting, solid theory! Not so much that their behavior changed but that it DIDN'T change...

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 1 year ago

I think there's also a correlation with anti-police sentiment as well. Police are less interested in protecting the public if the public doesn't support them. So maybe them letting aggressive drivers go is a sort of message to the public that we need the police.

Likewise, I think there's increased aggressiveness partially because there was a lot less traffic for a couple years during COVID shutdowns, and now it's back to normal, but it feels worse because of that period where traffic was less.

I'm sure there are plenty of other explanations as well. I'd like to see an investigation that pulls together a lot of theories and evaluates their merits.