this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
514 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19150 readers
1601 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rank-and-file members of both the House and Senate are paid $174,000 a year.

That probably seems like a decent amount of money, and it is: The median household income in 2022 was $74,580, according to the US Census.

But consider that members of Congress generally have to maintain two residences — one in Washington, DC, and one in their home state — and that they haven't gotten a raise since 2009.

Inflation, meanwhile, has eaten away at the value of that salary over time: If lawmakers' salaries had kept pace with inflation, they would be paid over $250,000 today.

Rep. Patrick McHenry, a North Carolina Republican who served as the interim speaker of the House following Kevin McCarthy's ouster, told The Dispatch that congressional pay needed to be raised in order to attract "credible people to run for office."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 209 points 11 months ago (10 children)

Let's just build a big congressional dorm with furnished studio apartments and make them all live there when Congress is in session. It would save the government a fortune in cost of living reimbursements and security costs.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

You know genuinely I don't understand why this isn't a thing. It's expensive to have two homes, especially when you aren't even sure you'll have the job for more than two years. It would lower the cost of entry into politics for people who do work minimum wage.

Shoving someone into a land full of surprise expenses seems like a perfect recipe for corruption.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago

It would lower the cost of entry into politics for people who do work minimum wage.

It sounds like you understand perfectly well. Politics is for rich people to get more power, and get richer by granting favors to their friends. "Public servant" is the lie they tell to make us feel good about it.

Yes, I know that there are the few modest politicians, but it's the exception to the rule.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They could also just have an apartment, they don't need a mansion in Virginia.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Even 2 apartments are expensive, I remember AOC was having trouble finding one in DC

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

Congressional barracks or even a neighborhood would actually be a great idea. It could get its own metro line.

Like it’s a job with a lot of time there. I think it’s fair that they be able to comfortably live there with their spouses and other loved ones, but it would be good to keep housing centralized to them. I’m reminded of Air Force neighborhoods where I grew up. Sometimes your aimless walk would get you a conversation with someone holding a machine gun because there are medium security off base residences

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Matt Gaetz would organize a panty raid. I guarantee it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

I had toyed with the idea of putting cameras all over the building and charging to view them...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There would be the added perk of people not wanting to remain congress critters for more than a couple of terms unless they really care about the job

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

A bunch of them sleep in their office already. Worst kept secret in Washington. Dorms would be an upgrade.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I was also thinking the extremely wealthy wouldn't want to tolerate living without the luxury they are used to.

[–] CaptDust 3 points 11 months ago

Squid games dorm

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Put them in government housing on welfare with Medicaid.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Many members of Congress already sleep in their office (which is technically against building codes). Dorms would be an improvement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

That's a version of Big Brother I'd definitely watch. At least the first season.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Great idea. And we have so much unused real estate the government owns in DC if they didn't force people to return to the office.