104
Colorado Republicans appeal to supreme court after Trump disqualified from state ballot
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
104 points (94.8% liked)
News
23655 readers
3651 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is it though? Lot of originalists. And getting rid of the rule of monarchy was as foundational to the US's independence as it gets. I find it hard to believe the supreme court would elevate someone above the law.
The so-called "originalists" don't actually give a shit about the Constitution though. Like, there's nothing there that justifies judicial review as a power that SCOTUS is actually supposed to have, but you sure as hell won't see any of these fuckers arguing to curtail it.
"It takes a lot of money to have the constitution interpreted correctly"
The law is whatever the Pope says or whatever guy is willing to give justice Thomas the most money.
All those justices must realize that if they help this fascist return to power, they will lose their positions, power, and more under the thumb of a narcissistic dictator who doesn't need laws interpreted or upheld. To preserve themselves, SCOTUS must side with the Constitution against this Oath Breaker.
I guess this would be my take as well. "Enlightened Self-interest".
There is no such thing.
That's just another excuse they use to justify whatever they want next.
If the justices are compromised they would.