this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
62 points (81.0% liked)

Games

16925 readers
817 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO
62
Gaza conflict embroils Game Awards (www.axios.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/games
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

More than 70 recipients of The Game Awards' Future Class are calling for a statement to be read at next week's The Game Awards, on their behalf, in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza, amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas war.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do not assume good faith

I'm not. I'm proposing a mix of diplomacy (lobbyists meeting with reps) and public demonstrations (protests to get popular support). If bigger and more frequent the protests, the more the lobbyists can get from reps.

When a bill is considered, that's the point where individuals should get involved. Calling/emailing doesn't do much, but showing up at public hearings absolutely does, and a regular member of the public has way more sway there than a lobbyist. The goal here is three-fold:

  1. Demonstrate public interest in the issue (protests and polls)
  2. Work directly with reps to draft an effective bill and get it in front of the legislative body (lobbyists)
  3. Show specific support for the bill by constituents (members of the public showing up at hearings)

and then the protests will stop

An open letter isn't a protest, it's virtue signaling. Instead of that, actually protest.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is assuming good faith. They will not engage in diplomacy with you, or work with you to draft legislation. They will lie to your face for as long as you'll let them. They. Do not. Work. For you.

You can call this protest not an Actual Protest or whatever, but it made this conversation happen where it otherwise wouldn't have. When we take to the streets, we'll be told that we're still "virtue signaling" ๐Ÿ™„ and the right time and place isn't blocking traffic.

[โ€“] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 1 year ago

This conversation only happened because someone who already agrees with the topic posted to a site where the majority already agree with the topic. That's the only reason we're discussing it. An open letter only scratches the backs of supporters, and nothing else. It's worthless.

Real change happens on the streets with protests (think Civil Rights movement, Vietnam protests, etc) and with lobbyists on Capitol Hill. It doesn't happen with open letters, social media posts, or emails to reps.