this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
58 points (95.3% liked)

World News

39151 readers
1942 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Until the cause of this one is determined, the only V-22 crash that wasn't pilot error was due to a maintenance error where a mechanic wired the controls backwards.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pilot error is rarely the actual cause, but is a convenient scapegoat. I worked in rotary accident investigation in the Army and that’s not something you’ll read in a report. There’s other issues; why is this aircraft in particular so prone to pilot error? Perhaps it’s poorly designed?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's because it's a heavy rotorcraft. Not poor design, just rotorcraft physics. It's prone to enter a vortex ring state if the descent rate in relation to forward velocity is too high. The same thing can happen with any normal helicopter, but the V-22 has a lot of weight for the disk area of it's rotors, giving stronger vortices from the rotors.

It's a pilot training thing, but I think they did put some sort of alert system on it if it's getting close to the conditions that induce VRS.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_ring_state

https://www.knoxnews.com/story/news/2022/06/28/ntsb-jim-clayton-fault-fatal-tennessee-river-helicopter-crash/7760608001/

https://verticalmag.com/news/ntsb-report-virginia-state-police-helicopter-crash/

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_mwUCiiEHos

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://m.piped.video/watch?v=_mwUCiiEHos

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's because it's a heavy rotorcraft. Not poor design, just rotorcraft physics.

Like I said, poor design. Wrong tool for the job.

It can’t travel slow enough for blackhawks nor fast enough for fixed wing. The V-22 is an absolute turd.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought they were designed for things like marine search and rescue, where speed is important and the ability to hover is essential.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

They're great at this, but the pilot needs to stay within the operating envelope, same as any helicopter.

All rotorcraft are dangerous compared to any fixed wing aircraft. It's a lot less forgiving on pilots and maintenance crews.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well, they’re not fast (prop too big) nor are they particularly great at hovering (rotor too small).

It’s the worst of both worlds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're faster than any conventional helicopter, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, but slower and less range than fixed wing. Likewise, it can’t do rotary wing things as good as a helicopter. It’s truly a “master of none” aircraft. It’s not great at anything.

Putting it in a rescue role is a terrible idea. You do not want a finicky to fly, unreliable aircraft in that scenario.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Read all the links, it's nothing unique to the V-22. All rotorcraft suffer from the same condition.

Pilots just have to be careful while descending with low forward velocity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I repeat - tiny heavily loaded rotors are the wrong tool for the job thus making it a bad design

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Interesting, I heard it had a very bad reputation for it's reliability, but I guess it's just that it's extremely hard to control then.