this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
266 points (89.8% liked)

The Right Can't Meme

871 readers
1 users here now

About

This community is about making fun of dumb right wing memes. Here you will find some of the cringiest memes that the right has ever posted on the internet.

Rules

  1. All posts must be memes containing right wing cringe

  2. No unrelated content

  3. No bigotry

  4. Spammers and Trolls will be instantly banned. No Exceptions.

Other Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 157 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just to make it clear, to anyone who may be in doubt... Ussage does not affect the way your "sandwich" looks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not true at all. A vagina looks way different when you're having vaginal sex.

[–] Ookami38 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True enough, it'll definitely be distended and have signs of visible arousal during the moments that someone is having vaginal intercourse. No long-term changes after arousal does down, tho.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

after arousal dies down

What is this mythical post-arousal phase you're talking about. I'm horny 24/7.

[–] Ookami38 4 points 1 year ago

I am too, but we're talking about vaginas so I didn't think it was relevant :p

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correct but only during sex. Returns to normal after use. Not like this picture suggest that the more sex you have the more of an outie you get

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're saying during sex which yes there are physical changes to the presentation that occur when aroused. Not this bullshit sandwich effect for sure but still, they're not wrong it's just a really weird point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The person you're replying to is named Send me photos. I think they were just trying to get some noods.

edit: typo

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I see that, but I responded because the person above sendmephotos was negative and it kinda bothered me.