this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
331 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

57453 readers
4586 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Parkinson’s patient can now walk 6km (3.7 miles) thanks to an implant targeting the spinal cord. The Guardian reports that the man — 62-year-old “Marc” from Bordeaux, France — developed severe mobility impairments from the degenerative disease. “I practically could not walk anymore without falling frequently, several times a day,” he said in a press release announcing the breakthrough. “In some situations, such as entering a lift, I’d trample on the spot, as though I was frozen there, you might say.” Wearing the spinal implant allows him to walk “almost normally” as the research team eyes a full clinical trial.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Think smaller - it will be determined 'not medically necessary' by insurance, and cost $100k out of pocket.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The company I work for makes similar devices. We make spinal chord stimulators https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinal_cord_stimulator and deep brain stimulators https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_brain_stimulation

The change in people is amazing. That said your estimate is not far off for cost of just the implantable generators, plus the leads. Add on cost of surgery and doctors bills and hospital stays and your probably under estimating.

Not to mention typically it's the last choice for pain treatment, so it's a the end of typically years of pain. Also it only lasts for about a dacade due to the battery so you will need to repeat the surgery and buy a new device periodically.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why not make the battery port to be located outside of the body? So that you'll only replace the battery without changing the whole thing

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's a pacemaker battery. They use induction charging. A cable runs down the neck to connect to it. The charger just kind of magnets on there. The charger is also where you connect to the onboard software and choose what settings you want. Dad's had a specialized device for that. I can imagine a smartphone connection eventually, but with the security concerns I imagine that's not likely to happen soon.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

You are almost completely correct. It does have wireless charging but like your cell phone eventually the life of a rechargeable battery wears and needs to be replaced.

That you are wrong about the last part. Our latest two generations actually use ipads for the doctors and iphones for the patient. I don't know too much about the security on them as that's my area of knowledge. That said unlike a pacemaker our devices don't keep people alive. They lessen movement disorders and reduce pain but people won't die if they get turned off.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

God damn a bunch of sad sacks in this thread

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

A large part of the American healthcare system is made of for-profit businesses. Capitalism and genuinely empathetic healthcare are mutually exclusive, and the parts that actually work for patients have only managed to do so because of a shit-ton of regulation. Regulation that corporations are constantly fighting and struggling to weaken. They buy politicians to help.

Pharmaceutical companies will claim that drug prices are high because R&D is so expensive, but that didn’t stop them from fighting for the right to advertise prescription drugs on TV. Last I read, only the U.S. and New Zealand allow that. Producing and airing those ads can cost millions. R&D is expensive, but apparently not so expensive that they can’t afford that. Capitalism does not have a conscience.

I’m a sad sack because I’ve seen (and am currently seeing) friends and family members get screwed by a system that allegedly exists to help them, but really just profits off their pain. I know I’ll probably end up being exploited, too.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ok, but it's really nice that there's a new treatment giving a dude a way better quality of life and give hope to others.

We don't have to immediately turn everything into sadness. Sometimes stuff can be good, without a bunch of people trying to figure out why it sucks because everything sucks and woe is the world.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You know what? You’re right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Romania also allows ads for medicine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Some of us have had to deal with the American healthcare system :).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Bingo. Parkinson's and ms treatments already aren't cheap.