Designed this storage solution for belts
https://www.printables.com/model/519768-belt-organizer-hanger-6-or-8-belts
this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
449 points (97.3% liked)
3DPrinting
15794 readers
17 users here now
3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.
The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or [email protected]
There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]
Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
-
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn (NSFW prints are acceptable but must be marked NSFW)
-
No Ads / Spamming / Guerrilla Marketing
-
Do not create links to reddit
-
If you see an issue please flag it
-
No guns
-
No injury gore posts
If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is 
Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What if you have an uneven number of belts because you take one or put one away? It would be very instable and would tilt without the same weight front and back.
That's my thoughts too.
This is just a suggestion, not a knock or anything against the poster. But a solution I think could work is to rotate the hook 90 degrees and have 2 of them, one at each end. Then it would remain flat and balanced no matter where the belts are on the rack.
Not a perfect solution, you wont see or have access to the belts at the back and the mount takes up more space on the rail. But at least you aren't playing a balancing game each time you take a belt.
I think I'd hang the hook off the end, so that the belts are stored in a vertical tree (slightly sloped, so that they don't fall over each other.) But that's an entirely new redesign for something that only really matters if you care about it.
There's a little bit of movement but it's not too annoying. When loaded up with belts, taking one off doesn't make a big difference.
I can barely code fibonacci, doubt I could model it
Just leave the empty gap in the middle? Come on Sam, we've got to work together on stuff like this!
Buy a decoy belt that only gets used when you're wearing one of the real belts. The decoy belt can get a wall mounted hook so it's out of the way when no belts are being warn.