this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
1026 points (93.1% liked)

Political Memes

5515 readers
931 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Wiki - The paradox of tolerance states that if a society is tolerant without limit, its ability to be tolerant is eventually ceased or destroyed by the intolerant. Karl Popper described it as the seemingly self-contradictory idea that in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must retain the right to be intolerant of intolerance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But the right's problems are things like "black people exist" or "trans people exist", or really just a bunch of variants of that for different people they hate. The Nazi comparison isn't invalid, and there's absolutely no reason for the left to entertain their problems as legitimate.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No it's not. I mean for example people who live next to a refugee home and asked for help to deal with the problems that came with it. Just really boring problems that could have been actually resolved. Like people dumping their trash on the streets, ignoring driving rules, minors stealing in corner shops, stuff like that.

In these neighbourhoods it could have been prevented that the people don't want more refugees or even vote for AFD. But instead, when people mentioned these issues, they were called racists or Nazis. Because it was uncomfortable to talk about it and everyone wanted to seem extra tolerant.

I wonder if people still think it was worth it to ignore these complaints as petty. That behaviour has antagonized a bunch of people from the cause. Only for the short gratification of a holier than thou attitude.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

"minors stealing in corner shops" isn't an actual problem, it's perfectly normal.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

That is not generalizing at all. /s There are a lot of people on the right side of the spectrum, some are also compassionate and tolerant

Since it's a spectrum, polarising means ignoring them and forcing them to decide among 2 poles, and guess what will happen?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You just generalized a huge side of the political spectrum as simple minded racists. Then you said that for that reason, their problems don't matter.

Don't you see a problem with that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Their problems are self inflicted, there's a difference.