this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
499 points (89.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12392 readers
1039 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

"If you can look at the situation and not be on the side of Palestinians, then you are on the wrong side of apartheid and history will show that in time,"

This post on her part was fine, but the other one...not so much. She should have stuck with this one only, rather than whatever the frick murderous thing that other post was.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Keep in mind she was a Lebanese refugee that lived through the conflict between Hezbollah and Israel. I'm not condoning anything she said but she has a somewhat understandable view of the whole situation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lived through the conflict between Hezbollah and Israel

And what about the conflict between actual Lebanon and what became Hezbollah?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dunno why this is getting downvoted, the only Lebanese folks who don't despise Hazbollah are Hezbollah, and the Iranian dispatched clerics.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there a quote for the other post? I heard it was just paraphrased, so we don't know what she actually said

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Can someone please tell the freedom fighters in Palestine to flip their phones and film horizontal," she wrote on the platform on Saturday.

That's all. If you're very inattentive or deliberately misinterpreting her words, you'd think that she was endorsing Hamas as "freedom fighters".

But if you DO pay attention and know anything, you'll notice that she never mentions Hamas and know that Hamas aren't usually the ones filming any of their atrocities. Add her clarification from a few days later and it's clear that she did NOT endorse Hamas and is the victim of character assassination because she had the temerity to speak up against the apartheid regime:

I just want to make it clear that this statement in no way shape or form is [inciting] spread of violence," she said. "I specifically said freedom fighters because that's what the Palestinian citizens are... fighting for freedom every day.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm confused. Who else is fighting besides Hamas and the IDF?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are other kinds of fighting than violence on a grand scale. Regular Palestinians are fighting the apartheid regime in ways big and small every day.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks, that's pretty much what I figured you'd say. The down vote was a nice touch.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I have this odd quirk of downvoting sealions when they ask bad faith questions with obvious answers that they refuse to accept. I'm kooky like that!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you distinguish between a good faith question and “sealioning”?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A good faith question is when you're honestly seeking clarification either because you don't know something or don't know what the other person means.

Sealioning is when you're "just asking questions" in a manipulative manner with no intention of taking the answers seriously under consideration or making a valid point of your own.

It's often used in place of an actual argument when the sea lion knows that their point isn't strong enough to withstand scrutiny.

Here's the origin of the term afaik:

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

defining is when you decide or declare that a certain string of words is equivalent to a word.

distinguishing is when you decide or declare which of two categories a particular thing is in

I know the definition of these words. I’m asking you distinguish, as you read comments on the internet, which are which kind?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Subtle, I like it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you please tell me how else can you interpret that statement other than her asking for better footage of the atrocities committed by the Hamas?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hamas don't tend to film their own atrocities and they're not the only ones committing atrocities.

Israel is also committing atrocities and the oppressed citizens of Palestine are filming a lot of it. THAT'S the footage she asked to be recorded in landscape rather than portrait.

Perhaps still not in the best taste for a public platform, but it's a damn sight better than endorsing terrorism like this article and others are incorrectly claiming.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why don't "freedom fighters" don't "fight" the atrocities rather than film them?

Keep in mind this was said in the context of the Hamas attack.

Seems like you people are just whitewashing her.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're seriously asking why regular unarmed people are documenting human rights abuses rather than physically attack heavily armed soldiers who are in the middle of demonstrating how little Palestinian lives matter to them? Is that what you're actually asking?

Also, who says it was said in the context of the latest Hamas atrocity? Judging by the actual words and sentences, it would seem much more likely to be in response to bad video of the retaliatory atrocities of the Israeli oppressors.

Seems like you're very eager to tar and feather her for speaking up against your favorite ethnostate.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why don't "freedom fighters" don't "fight" the atrocities rather than film them?

those regular civilians should hit the missiles with baseball bats, that'll show 'em. Much more effective than filming the atrocities being inflicted upon them and spreading the word online!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She said "freedom fighters", not "civilians".

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

In the largest apartheid concentration camp on earth, the civilian prisoners who document and expose their oppressors to the world are fighting for their freedom

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Holly shit the mental gymnastics here are astounding. You're just casually assuming that she is some kind of top geopolitical expert.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Nope. I'm merely refraining from assuming without evidence that she's endorsing terrorism.

You don't have to be "some kind of top geopolitical expert" to know that Hamas don't tend to film their atrocities themselves and that oppressed Palestinians very often film the atrocities of the Israeli occupation forces.

If there's any mental gymnastics here, it's in confusing common knowledge for elite geopolitical expertise.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of how planet of the apes was suddenly about antisemitism...

[–] guckfoogle 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's like she didn't realize her CEO was Jewish

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not all jews are zionists and implying so is antisemitic. It's the same old "dual-loyalty" smear levied against jews for hundreds of years.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Guess this one was though, eh?

[–] guckfoogle -2 points 1 year ago

I did not know thank you for letting me know

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What does being Jewish have to do with Israel? Are you conflating the two? Blaming Jews for what Israel has been doing for decades is pretty anti-semetic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No it's just that Jews have gotten prickly about anyone criticizing Israel because of how much trouble anti-zionism has had banishing anti-semitism from trying to infiltrate.

It's only changed because the Neonazis have absorbed enough evangelicals to decide they like the jews having Israel now because battle of Armageddon and "I know revelations says it is impossible to know when the rapture will happen but I'm gonna try and make it happen anyways like an absolute dumbass!"

[–] guckfoogle -1 points 1 year ago

Stop putting words in my mouth

load more comments (5 replies)