161
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jws_shadotak 80 points 9 months ago

Don't listen to this bullshit. I hear higher ups like this talk all the fuckin time about how we're "on the brink of war" but nothing happens. They're just constantly edging themselves at the thought of us going up against another adversary.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 9 months ago

Exactly. Hell, even suggesting direct involvement in another unwinable middle eastern war would be political suicide. Of course someone who’s entire profession is war is all about war.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago

By putting a fleet off the shore of Isreal we prevent Syria and Egypt from getting involved.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago

Egypt is generally a pretty cooperative partner with Israel and the US.

After all, Gaza has a border with Egypt that the Egyptian military also blockades, though of course no one likes to talk about that detail very much.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Yes I was very surprised and confused as to why Gaza would be stuck if they could just trade easily through Egypt, now it makes more sense, they're just fucked.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

That's the thing. For as much nominal support the Arab world gives Palestine, there is absolutely nothing preventing Jordan and Egypt from welcoming in Palestinians.

Except that Palestinian militants conducted an attempted coup against Jordan in 1970, and Hamas routinely conducts terrorist attacks throughout the Sinai peninsula, so neither country actually wants to deal with them.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

For decades, Arab countries played up the "plight of the Palestinians" not because they cared about those people, but because it distracted those countries' citizens. It gave them an external enemy to hate (Israel) instead of asking questions about their own governments' actions.

Jordon could have easily absorbed the Palestinians into their general population, but doing so would have removed a political pawn that Jordon could use against Israel. It was better for Jordon if the Palestinians were poor refugees living in squalor so that they could keep saying "look at what Israel did."

NOTE: I'm not absolving Israel for any of its actions. I'm just adding to the discussion by pointing out that the Arab nations only cared about the Palestinians to advance their own goals. The second their goals didn't align with the Palestinians' well-being, they were happy to let the Palestinians suffer and die.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Are you suggesting that Jordan and Egypt don't care about Palestinians because they don't allow Israel to forcibly relocate millions of refugees to their countries? Beyond the fact it's a war crime, it doesn't really improve the situation for anyone but Israel.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

The Gaza Strip literally was Egyptian territory. Hamas is a branch of the Egyptian Islamic Brotherhood. The Apartheid state as it exists is largely the fault of the two major attempts by neighboring countries to exterminate Israel and failing.

Egypt should care about the humanitarian crisis as it played a major part in starting it.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I agree with the second part of your statement. Egypt could do more. But I'm not understanding what the first part has to do with forced displacement to Egypt. Is that somehow justified by the history?

[-] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

Egypt being involved is pretty remote.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago

This looks like the final straw and the Palestinians will be kicked out of Israel for good. They likely will be relocated to Egypt.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

Lol 2 million people are not going to get relocated "for good"

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Israel only exists because millions of Jews were relocated "for good."

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Willingly, which I think is an important caveat

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I don't think they will be given the choice.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

Hamas are terrorist clowns and do not represent the Palestinian people. In fact, quite a few Palestinians hate Hamas. Israel knows this.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Except they have a very high approval rating and was one of the reasons they decided to attack again. Often their approval goes up after an operation as such.

https://apnews.com/article/hamas-middle-east-science-32095d8e1323fc1cad819c34da08fd87

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Israel knows. But doesn't care. The mere existence of Hamas will be used as justification for more brutality and collective punishment.

Because that's what Israel does. It's the reason why Hamas exists in the first place.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Isreal are oppressors no doubt. Hamas are terrorists which is also true. Around half of Israelis are Arab.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Eh, the US would really like an excuse to wipe Iran off the map before the get nukes.

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
161 points (88.9% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3528 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS