this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
2861 points (98.1% liked)
Piracy: ź±į“ÉŖŹ į“Źį“ ŹÉŖÉ¢Ź ź±į“į“ź±
53370 readers
654 users here now
ā Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules ā¢ Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
š° Please help cover server costs.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Right, and that statement itself is a massive oversimplification of the process. I feel like I've explained that in detail many times already.
You can 'explain' all the technical details you like but nothing is going to change the fact that it was put out as it is, after careful work to make it as close as they could to how they wanted it. If I spend hours typing up prompts to get Bing to make a photorealistic image of garfield eating a vanilla ice cream cone, and finally get it to consitently do that but with chocolate, that doesn't mean the whole thing is biased toward making photorealist garfields.
Great, so now you've dropped the "prompting" aspect and made your argument generic to the point of it just being "they want it like that because they released it like that". Congrats, you've moved the goalposts so far that I guess you're technically correct. Good job?
I didn't drop the prompting. over half that comment is specifically an analogy about prompting. are you ok
Your analogy has absolutely nothing to do with how LLMs are trained. You seem to think GPT is just prompt engineering...