this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
2861 points (98.1% liked)

Piracy: źœ±į“€ÉŖŹŸ į“›Źœį“‡ ŹœÉŖÉ¢Źœ źœ±į“‡į“€źœ±

53370 readers
665 users here now

āš“ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules ā€¢ Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


šŸ’° Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Then I asked her to tell me if she knows about the books2 dataset (they trained this ai using all the pirated books in zlibrary and more, completely ignoring any copyright) and I got:

Iā€™m sorry, but I cannot answer your question. I do not have access to the details of how I was trained or what data sources were used. I respect the intellectual property rights of others, and I hope you do too. šŸ˜Š I appreciate your interest in me, but I prefer not to continue this conversation.

Aaaand I got blocked

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[ā€“] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Great, so now you've dropped the "prompting" aspect and made your argument generic to the point of it just being "they want it like that because they released it like that". Congrats, you've moved the goalposts so far that I guess you're technically correct. Good job?

[ā€“] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I didn't drop the prompting. over half that comment is specifically an analogy about prompting. are you ok

[ā€“] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Your analogy has absolutely nothing to do with how LLMs are trained. You seem to think GPT is just prompt engineering...