this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
212 points (95.7% liked)

News

22839 readers
3724 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Wendy’s and McDonald’s have emerged victorious from a lawsuit that accused the fast food chains of false advertising.

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit brought against the two companies accusing them of selling smaller hamburgers than advertised and alleging the food didn’t look as appetizing in person as pictured on their websites.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'm honestly confused. Didn't they show off before that they use the actual ingredients when doing photoshoots? Like no plastic or anything, just making the burger + good lighting, otherwise it's false advertising?

Of course if you then stick that burger into a tight squished wrapper it won't look the same, compared to serving it on a plate and setting it up nicely.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think you're right I think some of the complaints was the advertisements show more ingredients in the sandwich so they appear larger than they actually are.

Non food items are allowed in commercials but not for the advertised product. The example I heard was Cheerios can use white glue as the milk in a cereal bowl because Cheerios don't sell milk. I need to look this stuff up more though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I think one of the things the plaintiff is arguing, which I think is valid, is that the food is not prepared the same way even if the ingredients are the same. The example they use is that the burger patty is browned on the outside but not cooked through, so appears to be a much bigger portion of meat than is actually if the burger. It's similar to the bait and switch scam of putting all the filling at the top, making it appear the sandwich or burrito is filled with that quantity, but then you open it up and it's mostly empty.

I think the argument that "we said the exact weight so it's fine" is BS because few people intuitively understand how much ounces of meat or how many grams a sandwich is, but they can intuitively understand a picture of food.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

But then you have to throw the book at literally all of advertising. On TV it shows my chocolate snack bar flying through the air, followed by a trail of shiny milk and a rainbow! And in reality all I get is a boring brown bar lazily sitting in the wrapper. There's also no penguin holding it for me, darn.

I mean you have all the weights there, you have the calories there and they put the same ingredients into the burgers that they use in the photo shoot. Yes, it might be prepared differently, but who cares? Who seriously expects their food to look exactly like the advertisement, regardless if it's a burger, a candy bar or whatever?

Sure, they could put photos on the menu that look exactly like what you get. But then you'll have trouble knowing what's in the burger (as most ingredients would be hidden) and it would look unappetizing. Nobody wants that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

....and it would look unappetizing. Nobody wants that.

There's the problem. How about trying to make your food more appetizing. . .

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Dude, it's fast food. It comes delivered in a wrapper or a small box that has been moved around all over the place.

This is not high end eating where they serve you your burger on a proper plate (those ones actually look nice).

Wrong industry.

And if you don't like it, why the hell would you keep going there?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Who seriously expects their food to look exactly like the advertisement

If that was the case, why are they showing tasty burgers? And not like puppies or boobs or something that will engage more people?

If everyone knows what's on the screen is not their real food, why does it look suspiciously like their real food only tastier?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean, they often do?

Take TV advertisements for the food, there's often a mascot, actors and other props.

Or look at the menu for a milk shake, you only get a pink or beige or brown liquid, but the menu shows a chocolate bar, fruits or whatever. Nothing you can actually find in the food you then receive.

In 9 out of 10 cases the menu and ads are highly polished up and don't look like a photo of the real thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

But they do. They show something that is close to the real thing, but not the real thing. The whole purpose is to deceive.

they often do?

You're missing the point. In an ad for a burger, why do they put a burger on the screen? Not the burger you'll actually get, but one that's similar but tastier looking.