Fediverse

27398 readers

662 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Posts must be on topic.
Be respectful of others.
Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1214

Now that we're finally out of reddit, can we finally get different tag for NSFW and NSFL? (bookwormstory.social)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

105 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For the uninitiated, generally NSFW is for sexual contents and NSFL is for gory contents. People may want to see one but not see the other at any time for any reason. I have seen this feature requested over the years in Reddit but it never happens. Maybe now some instance can finally implement it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 81 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I've always thought, of all the options to warn us that clicking will put titties on our screen, that "not safe for work" was a bad choice.

Like, what if your work doesn't care about titties? What about the tons of other times you wouldn't want those to pop into your screen without warning, like when you're on public transit, or sitting next to grandma?

I'd vote for "LEWD" vs "GORE" or something more clear - users can decide for themselves when it is or isn't safe.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Correct, if you work for e.g. Pornhub, NSFW might have a different meaning

[–] [email protected] 49 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I can just imagine the HR conversations at Pornhub. "Steve, we have reason to believe that you've been viewing non-pornographic material at work."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Reminds me of when new episodes of Rick and Morty were being posted on PornHub and they took them down.

[–] ricecooker 6 points 10 months ago

"Steve, your numbers are down. We have reason to believe you have not been viewing enough pornographic material at work."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I can imagine they don't want accountants or IT people looking at porn while they work though. Their own websites are probably not filtered, but whether the work is for a porn site or a car manufacturer, you prefer them focussing on their work. For a content reviewer though, it's a different story.

That being said, there is not enough money in the world that would convince me to become a content reviewer. The shit they have to sit through is often utterly vile and traumatizing. Here is an article about a facebook moderator as an example: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-57088382

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I was mostly joking, but yeah, being a content reviewer has got to be a soul crushing job. I can't even imagine the shit you would see.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Same if you work for the SEC.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My job doesnt care.

Of course i cant just browse porn all day, but clicking a random picture onnreddit with boobs?

Nobody cares

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Of course i cant just browse porn all day, but clicking a random picture onnreddit with boobs?

We should be able to look at a little porn at work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

We should be able to look at a little porn at work

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.