News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Oh no, don't get me wrong, my argument isn't "We should compromise and go further right", it's more "If we can grab someone who hasn't had a smear campaign run on them for half a decade, we should." I'd love to see AOC in the White House, I just worry that the well has already been poisoned, so to speak, for half a decade now. She's been the GOP boogeyman #1 for some time, and some of that soaks through to 'centrist' swing voters, unfortunately.
AOC's been targeted because she's talented. There isn't a second sleeper AOC who's just as charismatic and politically talented, but no one's ever heard of them. The amount of targeted smear campaigns in conservative media will correspond closely with how much potential the GOP thinks someone has.
Can you point to an effective female federal politician who hasn't had a shear campaign run?
Duckworth?
I mean, there will always be some smear campaigns in a politician's past, but AOC has been a very, very prominent target. Like, anytime you see Fox News playing, they've always got a picture of her looking angry for the mandatory Two Minutes Hate. A non-negligible amount of people are easily convinced by repetition - AOC is their most common target, and has been their most common target for 5 years. She has a lot more antipathy built up against her than probably any other member of the Squad. AOC was their replacement for Clinton hate. Only Ilhan Omar is really comparable in terms of being used as a GOP boogeyman.
And I mean, like I said, this doesn't at all mean that I'm opposed to an AOC candidacy. In a line-up like we had in 2020, I'd've voted for her even over Bernie. Not over 2016 Bernie, though. But that doesn't mean I'm optimistic about her chances.
Yeah AOC is up there with Clinton in getting smeared by the right wing media machine.
Sure wish we'd quit selecting our candidates based on what Republicans might like.
Ah, I hear ya! Who would you like to see run that you think could effectively dodge that sort of poison pill status?
It wasn't a factor when the party selected Clinton. It's only a factor for AOC because she's a progressive.
Nail on the head. I get the feeling that she's still tracked for 2028, assuming we aren't living in the neo-confederacy by then. I can't fucking stand having to wait another 4+ years for a candidate that I can just be comfortable expressing support in. What would America or the world even be like if Al Gore didn't have an election taken by the supreme court? Feels like a future they just can't stop taking from us because some enlightened centrist is going to say "you can't win without the middle." Fuck the middle. It's progress or fascism. They need to pick a side already so we can get to getting. If they need anymore time to decide than we don't want them.
No clue, honestly. Most convenient would be a sudden and meteoric rise from a regional sensation to a national one, like Obama in 08 or Bernie in 16, but one can't count on that, of course. I've got a 'wait and see' attitude as to the 2027-8 primaries, see who declares or seems interested in running before sifting through.
God, I hate that I'm thinking about primaries half a decade out from now.