this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
992 points (97.5% liked)

internet funeral

6830 readers
5 users here now

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤart of the internet

What is this place?

[email protected] with text and titles

• post obscure and surreal art with text

• nothing memetic, nothing boring

• unique textural art images

• Post only images or gifs (except for meta posts)

Guidlines

• no video posts are allowed

• No memes. Not even surreal ones. Post your memes on [email protected] instead

• If your submission can be posted to [email protected] (I.e. no text images), It should be posted there instead

This is a curated magazine. Post anything and everything. It will either stay up or be lost into the void.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I think maybe you're out of the loop here. This is part of a trend to screw over bots that automatically steal art and sell it on random sites. That's why others are commenting stuff like "I'd buy this on a t-shirt!".

The tactic has already been proven to work several times, when people post stuff like this, and then report the shops that steal it to Disney's legal team. It's a clever way to leverage Disney's lawyers to protect regular artists who couldn't afford to sue all these random websites.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The funny thing is though, I would buy this on a T-shirt

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Buy a transfer pencil and baking paper ... and a tee shirt I guess.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Instructions unclear, baked a pencil with my dick

[–] cantstopthesignal 2 points 1 year ago

God damn artists are too good at their jobs

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I’d buy your comment on a shirt!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I understand the tactic, it’s still a parody.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks. Other comments and replies have been alluding to this, but this is the only one that described the mechanism.