this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
754 points (98.2% liked)

Games

16950 readers
355 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because people learn their lessons only when they get punched in the face

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

2022: OnlyFans wanted to ban porn

2023: Unity wants to kill free-to-play games

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I doubt they will learn from this

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except this licencing change removes sustainability from all licencing models except the ones that run subscription models or advertising.

Now they say they aren't going to impose this crap over any not for profit or for profit that's earning revenue under 200K. But I have serious doubts that certain scenarios are going to slip through the cracks.

What it is essentially a way to bleed any viral indie game studio dry of their capital, which could force them to declare bankruptcy and sell off their assets.

I wouldn't be surprised if this was a way to build a unity game studio.

  1. Game goes viral and reaches the threshold of 200K+ revenue
  2. Every install and reinstall of the game gets charged, costs start to outweigh profits.
  3. Money drains fast with no way to stop it.
  4. Indie company declares bankruptcy due to cash flow issues
  5. Unity demands payment for unpaid bills in assets - gets the ownership of game title as payment.
  6. Unity opens game studio and continues to sell the game, while employing minimal Devs to maintain it.

Bam! they've a bunch of viral hits completely for free under their umbrella in a bunch of payments. And because they own the engine, they can make money hand over fist while stopping everyone else from doing the same.

That said I'm sure they have separate payment and licencing deals with big AAA companies. So really it's only the indie companies that end up with a viral hit that get screwed.

So the other option is that they do not open a game studio and they're merely just doing big techs dirty work and taking out their competition, while providing IP fire sales for big tech.

That said, once the company goes after a group for failure to pay this money, I wouldn't be surprised if a legal fight ensued in order to declare the terms of service unenforceable and/or anti consumer and have them nullified or forcibly rewritten/reverted. If that happens I'm sure the EFF or other non profit software foundation will end up providing legal funding and or services. Heck it could end up being a class action.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That 6-step plan is very evil, I love it. Hopefully people will now understand that proprietary software always leads to abuse. Everyone should switch to Godot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about the tons of games that already exist and we bought? What about the games being worked on right now? This is a disaster for indies.