this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
641 points (96.7% liked)

Antiwork

8222 readers
12 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Uh, seems like an odd reason to quit your job.

I'd have to quit my job twice a week if I left every time my boss said something dumb.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Taking away your labor power from chucklefucks who use the sweat of your brow to continue to oppress you is good praxis.

People talk about boycotting by not buying things from certain companies, but not enough people commit to not giving their labor to those companies in exchange for a paycheck. That's a boycott, too. When you're working for them, you're literally helping them believe the dumbfuck shit they believe, and allowing them to use their financial largess to influence the media to promote their dumbfuck bullshit.

Standing up for the people who no longer are "economically viable" means something. But go ahead, let your boss say your parents should just die when they're too damaged to work. Laugh with them about it. Go ahead and be a callous asshole who won't stand up for someone who can't stand up for themselves.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except here it seems the issue is with the boss/manager and not the owner. If they were to take their complaints to the owner and was still brushed away, then that’s a different story. Managers come and go, owners do not. If it was a good job, then it worth fighting.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Managers come and go, owners do not.

As much as "cool bosses" want to act cool, hiring a shitty manager and then hiding behind their shitty behavior is pretty common for "cool bosses" who aren't actually "cool bosses" because they like having a middle manager shithead to blame all their shitty decisions on.

They hired the manager, what does that say about them? The idea that it doesn't say something about the kind of person they want working for them is a joke.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Is "what do you think about social security income/disability income?" a common interview question?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just went to pay a visit to Craigslist Jobs to see what kinds of companies are there offering employment and man....there's no warehouse jobs in what was previously packed to the walls with them. I remember seeing the desperation during Covid when the worker shortage just cratered their economically exploitable pool. The amount of companies offering 4 digit bonuses was wild. And it looks like they're all but gone now, I really hope they went under.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Warehouse jobs are very often through temp agencies. Perhaps that wasn't the case in your area but things have now shifted that way there.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they’re in a position where they can quit their job because their boss said something dumb, then why not?

Must feel pretty good.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My ex-wife was like this. Making snap decisions without planning 5 minutes ahead. She did this exact thing one time. Got a job at a gluten-free bakery. They told her she needs to wear a hat or hairnet, and would need to remove her long nails per local health code. She said no, and quit. Mind you, this was her first job in 6 months while I was supporting the household alone. She told me this was a boundary she had. Biggest. Bullshit. I've. Ever. Heard.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok food safety is a little different than degrading behavior.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I think he's saying her behavior was bs, not the other stuff

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Not sure why you're being downvoted, that's definitely something I'd divorce for unless something changed.

In my mind it was more like, if you have the means (not necessarily by becoming a burden on someone else, but perhaps you have a few months of savings you can live off of) then sticking it to your arsehole boss (which I thankfully do not have) by just scampering, must feel pretty good.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Does it seem odd? Seems more odd to me to normalize a boss telling his employees that their parents deserved poverty

Plus this sounds like an escalating argument the boss made no effort to de-escalate. If the boss didn't get fired for it that says everything that needs to be said.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You'd be quitting less often if you stopped listening to your boss.

[–] sentient_loom 1 points 1 year ago

Seems insane, honestly. Unless the new boss was actively blocking the parents' income.