this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
1073 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
5235 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search engine::Google accused DOJ of aiming to force people to use “inferior” search products.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atzanteol 44 points 2 years ago (3 children)

They do so all the time - do you think judges are experts in every thing? The judge needs to understand the law. It's up to the counsel to ensure they have experts to explain the details.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago

Judges should specialize in certain areas for this exact reason. They should absolutely understand the material as well as the law.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They don’t need to be an expert. They need to be people that have basic knowledge of how the world around them works, and the ability to learn new things as that world changes. I mean that’s the basic requirement at any job I have ever had, why are they exempt?

[–] atzanteol 1 points 2 years ago

I'm assuming they asked what it was? Or for clarification? If so, then they learned.

[–] 9488fcea02a9 11 points 2 years ago

Wasnt there that judge who went and learned programming in order tp preside over a software patents case?